karenika
big sur
archives • main
MEANIE


I'm not mean.

I'm sure most people would say that's a cocky thing to say about myself. After all people aren't allowed to make self-personality assessments unless it's deprecating. Who am I to judge my own self? No one would really say they're mean, would they now? So obviously I shouldn't be allowed to defend myself on this subject matter.

Maybe in the past, I would have agreed with the above opinion. I might have said that other people's opinions of me are what matter as you are who people think you are.

Wanna know how I feel now?

I don't give a flying fuck.

Recently I've been told that I'm mean. It was a patronizing conversation. One that involved the words "I would never want to be a person like you. You're so mean." This wasn't a close friend. It wasn't even someone who can claim to know me well. However, it was a person with whom I deal with daily and it completely broke my heart.

My feelings for this person aside, the fact that he felt comfortable calling me mean angered me. Mostly cause it injured my feelings. If I were truly mean, surely his words wouldn't have affected me, would they? For the next few weeks, I gave him several chances to retract his statements, but he never did.

And I kept caring and I kept feeling bad and I kept apologizing to him in different ways. I figured if he thought I was mean, I must be a bad person, and I kept trying to overcompensate. I bent low and lower. I tried to talk to him many times. And it went nowhere.

Well, that's not exactly true.

It got to a point where I started having a low opinion of myself. I started believing that I was mean. I got frustrated and unhappy and actually became meaner. Which, of course, made matters even worse.

Today I got so fed up and so miserable that I hit my lowest point. And you know what's great about being there? It can't get any worse.

So I took a good look at myself, decided that this guy was full of shit, and started believing in myself again. I know who I am and I know who I am not. I know my weaknesses and I'm open to suggestions on how to fix them, but when it comes to abuse, I'm not your gal.

Not anymore.

Previously? New New Thing.


July 31, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | emotional | share[]


THE NEW NEW THING


Jake and I want to reading by Michael Lewis tonight from his most recent novel, Next.

At one point, Lewis mentioned a study by Robert Sapolsky of Stanford where, quite unscientific, research was executed on why older people show an inability/reluctance in adapting to change. Lewis explained that the research team discovered that people's ability to adapt to change was closely related to their experiences at a younger age.

For example, if you hadn't pierced your nose by 25 or so, there was little chance that you'd ever consider piercing your nose. The team supposedly wasn't able to figure why this was the case and they couldn't find any specific area in the brain that is used in adapting to the "new" which somehow depreciated with age. However there was ample evidence in favor of this idea.

Which would mean that it's crucial to try as many things as possible at a young age.

Or that seeds of open mindedness and curiosity need to be planted early on.

Sitting there, I thought to myself that I would hope to never be one of those people who have a hard time adapting to change. When I meet people who are negative on computers today, I find myself thinking how these people are choosing to overlook something that might improve their live tremendously. Of course there are negative aspects of technology but to completely rule out the possibility of it affecting your life positively seems nothing but small-minded.

I want to make sure I'm always open to new things. I don't want to be afraid of or intimidated by my lack of knowledge. I want to be open to uncharted territories and jump in the bandwagon. I try to do that in my twenties and I need to make sure that I also do it in my fifties. The idea of becoming the sort of person who's bitter towards change is a frightening thought for me.

So should I run out and pierce my nose?

Well, no. But I think I should be open the idea. I should consider it. It's not doing everything, as much as being open to the possibility of doing it.

That's what I never want to lose.

I've always been a firm believer that you can learn at any age. There's nothing extra-special in my brain that makes it easier for me to acquire a new language. People who claim that a language can only be learned at a young age can talk to me. I learned Japanese at 25. So I know that it's bullshit.

Humans are very good at making excuses. We're very resourceful when it comes things we don't want to do. We use lack of time, other commitments, work, family, anything and everything as a reason to not accomplish something. If you don't want to do something, you should just say so. It's pointless to use excuses. And there's no rule that says you have to learn anything. (well, there might be work requirements, but that's another issue)

I might like to pierce my nose, learn Swahili, a new programming language, or I might not. But I'd like to have the option. Now and forever. If that means I need to start now or try a bit of everything at a young age, then that's what I need to do.

Suddenly taking all these classes and turning my life upside down has an even bigger purpose.

Previously? Shortcut into Heaven.


July 30, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | literature | share[]


RECIPROCATION


"The point is...the point is how I feel. I don't care what gets done. I just don't want to die feeling that I never tried. I don't believe in Heaven, or anything. But I want to be the kind of person who qualifies an entry anyway. Do you understand?

Of course I understand. I'm a doctor.


Nick Hornby's new book, How To Be Good, raises many interesting points about the meaning of being good, marriage, family life, charity and cynicism. Although it's not directly related, the exchange above made me realize why I don't like some of the ideas that have become linked with Heaven and Hell.

My personal beliefs on the existence of Heaven and Hell aside, I don't like the implication that someone should "do good" so they can be allowed in Heaven. To me that sounds just as conniving as lying to get your way.

You should never do anything because you expect something in return. I've always believed that doing something because you want to or like to is the only acceptable reason. Anything besides that is guaranteed to leave you, and the other people involved, displeased.

Life is so very short and it makes no sense to waste your precious moments on something that makes you unhappy. I understand that people work so they can earn money so they can go on vacations or afford other things that make them happy. And, while I have another rant saved just for that case, that's not the scenario I'm talking about here. I'm talking about doing something because someone guilted you into thinking that's what you should do.

What's the point of doing something out of guilt? How much satisfaction do you feel after you've completed an act that someone else thought to be "important that you do"? How much energy do you put into doing something that someone else deems necessary? Do you think people are so stupid that they don't notice your heart's not in it?

What's the point?

Are you trying to cheat people, or God in the case of heaven, into thinking that just cause you go through the motions of doing something that someone else 'strongly urged' you into doing, that they suddenly will think you're this amazing and dedicated person? No one, but you, loses in the end. You're the one who gave up the time to do something that you didn't care to and you're the one who doesn't truly feel rewarded since deep-down you know you never wanted to do it anyway.

Talk about a sell-out.

I think you should help the homeless if it means something to you. Six mentioned a while back about reducing your guilt and how you should call your old grandma Jane only if you actually want to talk to her. There are no guarantees in this life and real and honest people, their emotions and God can not be bribed. Guilt is nothing but manipulation and doing something in the hopes of getting something in return is awfully close to bribery.

Stop fooling yourself.

Previously? Crush Me.


July 29, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | literature | share[]


CRUSH ME


I've always had bad luck with crushes.



At 11, I had a crush on one of the guys in my group. I guess over here, it would be called my "circle". Anyhow this guy was two years older than I and we were friends. He was always nice to me but never in the way I actually wanted him to be. I never really knew whether he was aware of my crush or not.

Until one summer day, we were chatting in the disco at the club in Burgaz. (the island where we live in the summer) He asks me who my crush is.

I, very coyly, say, "I'm not telling you."

"Well is he in our group?" he hollers over the music.

"Yep." I say softly, snuggling closer so he can hear me. Any excuse to be physically close to him.

"Is he my age or older?"

"Yep."

He smirks. "I'm the only guy in our group who fits in that category."

DOH!

Talk about stupid. Amazingly, even after my totally moronic give away we never dated. A few years later, I got the impression that he might have been interested in me, but it was way too late.


At fifteen, I moved on to concentrate all my efforts on another completely unreachable goal. This one wouldn't even talk to me unless it was for a cordial greeting. Sadly, we never moved beyond that and eventually my interest waned. To this day, no one knows that I had a crush on this guy. Our mothers were good friends and after the previous disaster, I'd sworn that I wasn't telling anyone. Twelve years later, it's still my little secret. It's going to the grave with me.


At eighteen, it took me all of ten days to construct a huge crush on a classmate in Calculus. A quarterback nonetheless. He and I were good friends for a while. We did the math assignments together and it seemed to work well and it gave me a reason to see him regularly. The football program I mentioned a few days ago was purchased due to this crush.

My best friend and I ran all around campus trying to buy one of these game brochures once we discovered that this guy's picture was in it. But the game had already started and the school wasn't selling them anymore. So we walked around the benches and my friend flips out a ten-dollar bill and says that she will give it to the first person who gives her the program (which had been worth only five). Three people rushed in at once and one very happy man gave us the coveted booklet. Which I still have.

One of my friends in high school had told me about how she used the codename 143 to say I love you. So I figured it might be a good idea to embarrass myself thoroughly once more, cause it had been a while since the last time I did that. So, I wrote a letter to this guy. I can't even remember what it said, but it wasn't a declaration of love or anything. All I did was put a "P.S." on the bottom that simply said 143.

Wasn't I clever?

Well, not really. He figured it out. And yet once more, surprisingly, he stayed friends with me so much so that he confided in me about his crush on my roommate. And then proceeded to date her best friend.


After him, I swore off crushes.

Previously? The Right Moment.


July 27, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | relationships | share[]


RIGHT MOMENT


Here's what's been on my mind for a few days:

What's a good time to let go?

When do you know that you're in over your head?

There is such a thing as caring too much. There are people who suck your emotions and sacrifices out of you, enough to wipe you clean. Enough to drag you down with them. Enough for you to lose control of your life and not even notice it.

I've had loved ones with severe problems. People with substance abuse issues. Anyone who's been on either side of that kind of a relationship will tell you that there is almost nothing you can do for someone who's using and abusing unless they're ready to face the truth.

Talking doesn't do any good. It might appear as if you're getting through to someone, and at times the person might even start understanding what you mean, but in the end, the power lies within him. And only him. (or her)

There is a fine line between being there for support and giving up your life for someone.

Let's take the following scenario. Let's assume you're female (Cause I am and it's a pain in the ass to have to write she or he each time.) You've been with your boyfriend Alex for two years. You like him and you've even thought of making long-term plans at times. In the last few weeks, Alex has started hanging out with his work friends and drinking. I don't mean every now and then, but each evening. He always calls and says he won't be home till late. You've tried talking to him a few times, but he gives you good excuses. He says that he needs to go out so that he can fit in at his job.

You can put up with it for a few weeks but after a month or two? You'll probably eventually decide that it's simply not going to work out. Hopefully, you'll have talked to him about this and tried to resolve it before you packed up and left. Either way, no one will blame you for leaving him. You might be sad, but you won't feel like you deserted him.

Now, imagine the same scenario, but Alex is an abuser. He is hooked on alcohol, drugs, he joined a movement, or he's gotten fired. In short, his world has twirled out of control and he's dragging you down with him. He's depressed, he yells at you, he pushes you away. You know that he's not doing it purposefully, he's in pain. He's not thinking straight. How can you leave him now? When he loves you so much and he's fallen so low. What an awful creature must you be to even consider leaving.

That's the thin line. There will never really be a good time to leave.

So you make a decision. Do you say, I'll stay with him and risk going down the black hole or do you walk away and be the bitch? I'd assume the answer might depend on the nature of your relationship. If you and Alex are married you might have a different answer than if you've been dating a while but have no official attachments. Then again, sometimes love is the tightest bond.

Either way, it's a tough decision and there are no right answers.

Anyone who says that there are hasn't really been there.

Previously? Four Years.


July 25, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | emotional | share[]


FOUR YEARS


A random stranger walking up to me and handing me his number while my dad and I are opening a bank account.

A phone conversation where he keeps saying "cool" which simply means between cold and warm to me.

Buying a football game magazine which cost five dollars for ten.

Watching my best friend kiss the freshman picture book.

Bouncing my first check ever. Groveling to the bank to not charge me.

The tray of constipation.

Having my portrait drawn by an art student.

A terrible eighteenth birthday where I find out my crush has a crush on my roommate. And then ten people spending the night in our room.

First time I earn money.

My roommate hollering to me that my alarm is going off.

Our first answering machine recording, made up from parts of songs.

Dammit! I will fuck you!

Painting the fence. Movie nights in DH2210.

Dropping out of sorority rush on day two.

First time I kiss a boy whom I'm not dating and don't get called the next day.

My first Halloween.

Waking my friend up at three A.M. to start studying for our history final. And non-stop studying for the next two days.

A summer living in Theta Xi.

A night spent sleeping in the hospital's waiting room.

All nighters. Mountain Dew. Diet Coke.

Spending ten hours in the cafeteria talking. Yuk yuk.

Talking someone out of a depressed suicidal mood.

Taking more than twice as many classes as acceptable. A dean, offering to pay for my class, if only I agree to drop one.

Getting drunk and discovering that I take off my clothes when I get drunk. Never getting drunk again.

Interviewing.

Bell Labs. First real job.

Email. Tons and tons of email.

Friends. Lots and lots of friends.

Teaching. Learning. Crying. Laughing. Growing.

I loved college.

Previously? Happie News.


July 24, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | learning & education | share[]


HAPPIE NEWS


"The grief channel, the woman at breakfast had said, but the deliberate stimulation of public mourning was hardly unique to the network where Wallingford worked. The overattention to death had become as commonplace on television as the coverage of bad weather; death and bad weather were what TV did best." - John Irving in The Fourth Hand

It's amazing how sometimes when you have a thought, everywhere you turn, you see examples of it. Earlier this morning, I was thinking of how the news always consists or tragedies and terror. Bad news is far more sensational than good news.

With the exception of rare outliers, all news organizations tend to place the negative news above the positive ones.

I am not saying that the bad news isn't important. By no means do I encourage avoidance of the sorrow in the world. Information, of all kinds, is necessary for each person. No matter which country you live in or are a citizen of, we all live in the same world and belong to the "highly-evolved" animal class of human. Miseries suffered in other parts of the world than our own are relevant to our lives. And it is partially our duty to do our part, however small it might be, in lowering the world's suffering.

Everything starts with awareness. If you don't know the news, you can't do anything about it.

Having said all of that, I've decided that there are many papers that highlight the bad news and to tip the scales a bit more even, we also need to read some good news. This is coming from the previously mentioned idea of celebrating successes.

Yes, there are terrible things going on in the world. Yes, there is too much suffering. Yes, we have much work to do. Yes, it's important to recognize the atrocities that are going on in the world.

But it's also important to be aware of the good news. The inspirational people. The movements towards making the world a better place, whether they're small steps or huge ones. The stories that fill us with hope, amazement, and happiness.

If we only look at the bad, we will feel defeated and frustrated. We won't notice that while many parts of the world are falling apart and millions of people are letting us down, there are quite a few who are fighting to keep things in place. A few who're striving to make positive changes.

So I decided I want to show people the good news. The stories that are often at the bottom of a web page or in the inside pages of a newspaper. So that after several hours of reading disaster news, you can spend a few minutes reading about the people who've chosen to do something about it. Or something that's simply going to lift you up. Or make you laugh.

In an effort to celebrate the good and be aware that it's out there, I present, happie news.

Previously? Cults.


July 22, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | literature | share[]


DOWNHILL


People do not knowingly join "cults" that will ultimately destroy and kill them. People join self-help groups, churches, political movements, college campus dinner socials, and the like, in an effort to be a part of something larger than themselves. It is mostly the innocent and naive who find themselves entrapped. In their openhearted endeavor to find meaning in their lives, they walk blindly into the promise of ultimate answers and a higher purpose. It is usually only gradually that a group turns into or reveals itself as a cult, becomes malignant, but by then it is often too late. -Deborah Layton in Seductive Poison

Until recently, I hadn't spent longer than three seconds of thinking time on the topic of cults. I had no reason to; I had never known anyone who had ever had any involvement, to any degree, with cults.

To me, cults had always been something weak people joined. People who lacked the capacity to think for themselves. People who wanted others to make the decisions in their life. People who could easily be deceived. I knew I would never join a cult. I even remember the Hale-Bopp incident and how we laughed at the stupidity of the people. I never stopped to think what had caused these people to become non-individuals that acted like lemmings. I assumed they had always been so.

A few weeks ago, I got in touch with an old college friend. A good friend who had asked me to call him a few months prior but between my vacation and usual hectic state, I'd put off calling him. When I finally got around to dialing his number, it didn't take me long to ask about his girlfriend and get the shocking news. This girl that he'd dated for quite some time, a computer scientist, had left him to join a cult. Of course, she denied its being a cult, but it was quite obvious to him and I knew him to be rational and felt confident taking his word.

I must admit that "joining a cult" would not have been in my top-500-reasons-why-couples-break-up list. As I plunged into my diatribe of how I would never join a cult, he asked me to read Seductive Poison and said we would chat afterwards. I read the novel and decided the above quote drove home the point my friend was trying to make.

While I still think it takes a certain mindset to join a group that evolves to be a cult, I can recognize that it's a lot more likely for a regular human to temporarily enter such a mindset than I would have originally thought. There are times in most people's lives where we feel like we're ready to give up. It might be because you lost a loved one, a job, a lot of money or many other reasons. But almost all of us go through a phase, however short or long it might be, where we feel alone, misunderstood and under-appreciated. Many of us lack self-esteem and want to make our loved ones proud.

The cult-leaders strike during those moments. They take the person who feels at the bottom and lift him up. They give him a purpose. They make him feel proud and important. Since most cults start as an encouragement or salvation tactic, they don't cause alarm flags to rise in the person's mind. By the time, the movement becomes a full-fledged cult, the people on the inside have long stopped questioning.

And that's the crucial point.

You must never stop questioning. It's necessary to reevaluate life constantly. Once you stop questioning, you never notice anything, you are now no different than a sheep in a herd. We display this behavior consistently. We think a lot before we make a decision but once it's made, we don't feel the need to reconsider it.

A common pitfall in long-term relationships is not realizing that you've long stopped loving your partner. You're still together only cause it's practical and that's how it's always been. Same goes for a long-term job. You don't ponder whether you still like it. You just do it day in and day out until you get to the next level and then you keep doing what you need to to get to the next level, and so on. You never stop and think about whether you are happy.

The only time we stop to rethink is if something major goes wrong. A partner cheats or you don't get an expected promotion. At that point, you've hit another low.

I'll buy that if you're depressed enough, you may be out of your mind enough to get involved in a cultish movement, but once you've recovered a bit of your sense of self, it's best to rethink every decision before being forced to do so.

It's the necessary tool for you to be in control of your own life.

Previously? Choke.


July 21, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | literature | share[]


SLIPPERY


The odor of alcohol mixed with the rotten food stuck onto the dishes in the sink. It kept attacking my nostrils, forcing my stomach to do flips. My brain yelled at my body for not concentrating on the issue at hand. With his fingers around my neck, was bad smell really my primary concern?

His fingers curled around my neck. Not tight enough to holler for the police, but too tight for comfort. Too tight for me to gulp. His eyes started directly into mine, overcome with anger. Spiteful words sprung from his mouth.

"You're a piece of garbage."

"You're worthless."

Tears filled up my eyes but didn't dare to fall down. I knew crying was a bad idea. It would only serve to infuriate him further in his intoxicated state. He was so large, and his arms so strong, that all he needed to do was lift his hands slightly and my body would follow. He could easily pick me off of my feet. He hadn't even bothered to lift his other hand; one was enough to cover the area necessary to grab.

I didn't like his fingers around my neck. In fact, I worried I might throw up, which would be much worse than crying. But I didn't panic. I didn't yell. I didn't blabber, like I usually did. I whispered softly. There were people in the living room and I wasn't about to make a scene. I wanted this to end as quickly as possible. I didn't even disagree.

"You're no better than the scum in the trashcan," didn't sound so far-fetched to me. I really had provoked him, although for the life of me, I couldn't remember how this particular fight had started. He might have been right. He probably was right.

All I wanted was for this to stop. As the tears started pouring down my cheeks, I apologized. I told him he was right. I'd fix it, whatever it was. I'd make it better. We could work it out. We would work it out. At that moment, nothing mattered besides his happiness. He was right and I was wrong. I needed him to forgive me.

The stench of vodka burned my eyes. The heat in the room made his palm sweat. His voice was getting louder and I worried his friends would overhear. I whispered more, as if to overcompensate for his lack of quiet. I tried to reason with him. I told him that I loved him and that I would fix it. I was there for him. I'd always been there for him. We'd make it work. My mind buzzed, like an overzealous student, trying to find the right words. The magic words.

Anything.

I wasn't angry. I didn't doubt him. Nor hate him. All that would come later. For now, I was desperate. Desperate for him to understand. Desperate for him to love me again. For the anger to dissipate. For the hatred to end. I begged. I groveled. I cried.

He let go.

Previously? Competition.


July 19, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | relationships | share[]


COMPETITION AND CELEBRATION


I've never been a competitive person.

A month after Jake and I started dating, we ended up taking a class together. Many people assumed that the class would put a strain on our relationship. That our differing grades might give birth to feelings of animosity between us.

But it didn't.

On the contrary, Jake and I chose to be in the same group and we encouraged each other and studied together. Even at that point, I cared enough about him that his getting a good grade made me happy and not jealous.

I tend not to define my life and successes by others.

I don't mean that to sound standoffish. It doesn't imply that I think I'm too good to compare myself to others. It just means that knowing that I'm more successful than so-and-so doesn't make me feel accomplished.

I don't want anyone else to be unsuccessful, unhappy or unaccomplished. There's enough room in the world for all of us to be happy and accomplished in our own ways.

I simply want to be the best that I can be.

This is where things get a bit sticky. It seems my personal requirements for becoming happy and successful are overwhelmingly high. Each time I reach one level of success, I set the next one without spending too much time doting on having accomplished the previous goal. I keep pressing and pushing, determined to see how far I can take it. How much before I break down.

Recently, Jake and I were talking about a success in his family. It was a situation that had done a 180 from the previous year. Last time, we'd wallowed on the sorrow and misfortune for quite some time and the spirits were very low. I was telling Jake that it's only fair that, this time "We should celebrate."

I said, "I think life should be all about under-emphasizing failures and over-celebrating successes."

After the words came out of my mouth, I was surprised at how rarely I listen to my own advice. It's crucial to learn from your mistakes but wallowing in them only makes you depressed. And it's important to celebrate the good moments in life. It's necessary to note having reached a goal. Otherwise, all the work I've done to get here doesn't seem so difficult. Yet it is. Each tiny step that gets one closer to happiness or self-satisfaction is a major accomplishment and requires due attention.

I've decided to take some of my own advice. I'll keep setting personal goals. I'll keep aiming higher and higher. But I'll also stop ignoring the importance of small successes. I'm moving from only jumping a series of hurdles to throwing many parties.

And you're invited.

Previously? Judging.


July 17, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


JUDGING


You are so judgmental.

If you mutter the words "Not me," you simply fall into the majority of people who don't admit to doing the very things of which they accuse others.

There are certain fundamental characteristics that are a part of every human being. While I don't believe we're necessarily born judgmental, we certainly develop this discriminatory outlook on life at one point or another.

The same way we discover lying.

I tend to be weary of anyone who claims to never lie. That's such an obvious lie that either the person is blatantly taking me to be a fool, or, worse, they are not willing to admit the truth to their own selves. We all lie. It's human nature. Some of us do it more compulsively. Some of us do it only under the pretense that they're sparing the other person's feelings. Some people have been doing it for so long that they don't even notice it anymore.

But everybody lies.

I have never met an adult who has never lied.

Neither have I met one who doesn't judge.

You think you are open-minded? Think back to the last time you saw someone with seven piercings on her face? How about the girl in pink tight leather pants with high heels and a low-cut blouse? The guy who wears big silver chains around his neck and no t-shirts? The fifty-year-old man who drives a Porsche convertible? The girl in a three-piece suit with a pearl necklace talking on her cell phone? Two men holding hands? A teenager kissing a seventy year old?

No matter how open minded you are, at least one of the above scenarios will make you jump to conclusions about a person. You make judgement calls on how much money she has or whether she works or not. You assume she must be after his money or that he must be not well educated. She must be a bitch and he must be fun to be around.

You might not hate any of the people. Judgmental doesn't necessarily mean that you're bigoted. It just means that you judge people on a certain set of criteria. We all have categories that we like to place people in and we use certain cues when we meet them to figure out in which category they best fit.

The most common cues are visual. If you want to test this out, give the same picture to a few friends and ask them to tell you about the person in the picture. How old is she? What does she to for a living? Would you like this person? Why?

I guarantee you that they will have answers. Most likely different ones (unless you have a really homogenous circle) but none of them will say that they cannot answer until they meet the person.

Our categories are defined by our surroundings. Possibly at the beginning by the values of our family, and then school, friends, work, etc. With each new environment and year, we might define the categories more specifically and we might realize that most people can't be classified easily.

But we do it anyway.

Previously? Fuck.


July 16, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


FUCK


I curse a lot.

And I mean a lot. My favorite curse word is fuck. I love the way the air gets built up behind my lips before it slowly escapes through my teeth. It's a word that encourages forward body movement. It gives me a sense of liberty each time it springs from my mouth.

It started in college, but I can't think of the particular reason or instance. It may have been an imitation of my surroundings. Or not. All I can remember is my first Christmas vacation in college. I returned back to Istanbul and I was in the midst of a heated conversation with my father. We switched to English, as we tended to do when emotions heightened, and the next thing I know my dad's face turned beet red.

My father has always been a perfect gentleman and I don't think I've ever heard him utter a curse word. He's the sort of person who knocks on an open door, just to make sure he doesn't disturb your privacy. He looked at me and said, "I would appreciate if you wouldn't use that language with me, Karen."

Now it was my turn to feel embarrassed. I hadn't even noticed the curse words.

During Junior year, when I was a Resident Assistant for fifty-nine women, the other RAs and our supervisor tried to come up with a replacement word so that I could feel the emotional release without offending any students. The best advice was "fire truck" but even that doesn't come close. That year, I made an extra effort, at least in front of the girls, as I figured it was my responsibility.

Upon graduation, I started working at the investment bank that still employs me. If you know anything about investment banking, it should be that there aren't many women in the industry. Same goes for technology. So as a coder in the bank, my cube was surrounded by the cubes of six men. A few weeks into the job, one of the guys walked up to me and asked me if I could lay off on the cursing for a while.

I hadn't even noticed.

I don't want to give you the impression that I'm not well mannered. I never curse in front of Jake's parents and neither with mine. I behave perfectly appropriately in situations that call for it. I would lie if I said I'm ladylike and dainty, but I'm not coarse. I don't curse at strangers or my clients. I try not to be offensive, but I don't enjoy people tiptoeing around me because of my gender. There are women who mind curse words and women who don't. Same goes for men. It doesn't directly correlate to your gender.

I try to respect the values of the people around me. But when my program craps out with a segmentation fault and the debugger won't tell me why, I feel a strong urge to abuse my computer.

It might not help me find the problem, but it really makes me feel better.

Previously? Biographies.


July 15, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | personal | share[]


DOCUMENTING LIVES


"Artists' lives, in those days, were brief. Often in the living, always in the writing. A painter's life was as long as a who's who entry or a note in a tourist guidebook. This was what artists' recorded lives mostly were, chronological lists of works with a note on technique or the odd illustrative anecdote thrown in. the most intelligent and ambitious of these assemblages - Vasari's in the mid sixteenth century and Bellori's a hundred years later - elaborated an idea of painting that each artist's career was used to illustrate. Neither the individual artist's inner life nor the minutiae of his social existence - the staples of modern biography - was felt worth retailing to anyone interested in the work." - Peter Robb in M: The Man Who Became Caravaggio

I can't claim to be a biography expert. I haven't even read many biographies, let alone studied the differences among sixteenth century biographies and twenty-first century ones. But the above paragraph made me think of how much attention we direct towards the personal lives of public figures.

The categorization of a public figure may vary widely from person to person. While we would all probably agree that the President of the United States qualifies as one, we might have heated arguments on the inclusion of specific painters, writers, actors, etc. This discrepancy will depend on our definition of public, our familiarity with the specific artist and his or her work, and how reclusive he or she is. For example, I'm quite confident that we could all agree that JD Salinger is not a figure whose name is plastered on the gossip columns weekly, yet he may easily qualify as a public figure because as the writer of a famous novel, his work is read by many and his name is familiar to the public.

I don't know if this has historically always been so, but what a public figure does during his or her private time is considered to be sought-after information today. A quick glance at the tabloids would suffice to prove my statement. There consistently is at least one headline in reference to a well-known actor. Stories range from distasteful to absurd. But anyone who's studied economics will tell you that the articles would never have been printed unless the readers found them interesting, or at least worthy. Obviously if no one cared about who Meg Ryan's current boyfriend is, no one would read the tabloid that prints stories on that subject matter and the paper would soon go out of business.

But it doesn't.

On the contrary, tabloids thrive. The paparazzi are well paid and keep their jobs without many struggles. They both continue making money even after the lawsuits and the badmouthing.

We don't care about Julia Roberts' acting career (well, acting students possibly do but not the regular population) we care about her relationships, her family, her misery. We feel that since she's chosen a career that's in the public eye, she owes it to us to make her life public. We feel that we already know her.

Yet we don't.

What the public sees of an actor is his or her character, scripted by someone else and simply acted by that individual. We read the stories invented by a writer (in the case of fiction). These public sides don't necessarily (or even often) correlate to the person behind the face or name. Just because I like John Irving's stories it doesn't mean we can be buddies or even that I would like him as a person. While each of his stories might contain some of him, they don't tell me who he is.

Also, these are one-sided experiences. I might have read all of Irving's books or watched every Julia Roberts movie, but they've never heard of me. They have never been inspired by me. And they don't necessarily care to welcome me into their lives. While they chose to have careers that affect the public, they didn't opt to not have any private life. And I believe it's unfair of us to assume otherwise. I can easily relate to the drive to want to get to know the person whose work inspires the reader and I can see the value of documenting the inner life of a person who's had a unique outlook on life. But lately, it seems we've become much more interested in the person, even to the point of obsession.

Peter Robb's words are not judging. They are merely a statement on the differences in styles of writing biographies between the past and now. However, to me, his words highlight a crucial difference in the society and its views on artists. They show how attention shifted from the work to the person behind it.

And I'm not confident that's a positive change.

Previously? New Day.


July 14, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | literature | share[]


UNMOTIVATED


The radio pierces through my dreams.

Or maybe it's my nightmares, I never seem to remember anymore. We've come a long way from the days when my college roommate, Holley, used to holler "Karen, it's your fucking alarm!" Now, Jake turns from one side of the bed to the other and I'm wide awake. I don't dream anymore. I don't really sleep anymore.

The radio is yelling. The dial is in between stations, but close to one so that the music mixes with static. The volume is turned up so high that it makes me jump out of my skin. I pound the tabletop savagely until the room is once again silenced. If I keep my eyes tightly closed, I can postpone the inevitable.

At least for another seven minutes.

The radio comes alive once more and I show it who's boss. But it's not whipped into shape, it takes only another seven minutes for it to commence its nagging. I pound it twice more before I give up. At this point, I have eight minutes to make it out the door. But I don't jump off the bed. I lie there with my eyes open, staring at the patterns on the ceiling.

As a child I always envied the kids with stars on their ceilings. With my less than stellar eyesight, I was unable to see my own hands at night, let alone a pair of florescent constellations. After my eye operation, I went out and bought a set of my own. Now I can stare at star whenever I wish to, even in New York City.

Even at nine A.M.

I finally drag myself into the bathroom, eyelids shut. Reaching for the bubble gum toothpaste, I move my arm up and down and side to side, like a well trained robot. I take my time because I know that I will need to open my eyes to brush my hair and I'm not ready just yet. I can hear the minutes ticking. The fear that I might have a 9:30 meeting grips me and I drop the toothbrush, wash out my mouth and comb my hair within a split second.

I race back to the bedroom and thank my lucky stars that I shaved last night. The long black skirt picks me and I throw on a white shirt and dig into my black shoes, I grab my bag, throwing in the keys on the way out. I yell back to the birdie, "See you tonight, Cupcik."

Hailing a cab, I check my wallet and the time simultaneously. 9:15, I'll make it in on time.

I dig into my bag and pull out my second most precious electronic item. I press play and turn the volume to twenty. The music takes over my soul.

This might be a good day after all.

Previously? The Need for Speed.


July 12, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | work | share[]


THIN LINE


I hate roller coasters.

That wasn't always the case.

Thirteen years ago, my parents took my sister and me to Disney World. My father had been telling us stories about Disney World for years, all made up. He'd tell us that there would be buttons by our bedside and when we pressed them Smarties would fall down.

Our trip started in Paris and involved New York, Florida, Miami, and ended back in Paris. It was the best trip I ever took with my family. We went on every ride and made sure to maximize each day. I even got to celebrate my birthday in two different states. I remember quite a few of the rides but one of the most memorable is Space Mountain.

We didn't know what we were getting into, we just eyed the extremely long line and figured it must be the best ride in the park. As we got closer to the ride, my parents got suspicious from the screaming and suggested that maybe we should go to another place. My sister and I whined about how long we'd already waited and how there was no way we were turning back now. And we didn't. Our turn came and our car took two couples, one in front of the other. I opened my legs and my sister sat in front of me with my arms wrapped around her chest. My mom did the same to my dad.

If you've ever ridden Space Mountain, you'd know that the place is completely dark. You cannot even see your own hand. When we got off the ride, my mom said that for a second she was confidant that my dad's heart had stopped as we did a huge dive. But I liked Space Mountain. It wasn't scary. At least that's not how I remember it.

By the time I made it back to United States, six years later, I had somehow done a complete 180. My boyfriend coaxed me to ride Steel Phantom and it was one of the worst experiences of my life. My head kept banging to the sides and I couldn't understand the point of it. When Jake and I visited Florida, we rerode the Space Mountain and I hated it.

I'm not really sure what happened between 14 and 18, but scary events don't seem to produce the exciting dose of adrenaline in me.

I don't understand the joy of sitting on a piece of steel and having your body throttled around. Why is it such a rush? How come cutting it close is such a thrill? Does it make you cool if you die of something moronic like mountain climbing without proper equipment? Is it all to compensate for some other area of lacking? Or maybe it's me who's undercompensating. Maybe I'm running away from some bigger fear. I really don't know the answers. All I know is that I hate motorcycles. I can't stand roller coasters. I never felt the need to go bungee jumping. I don't even watch scary movies. Nothing scary turns me on.

Except for jumping out of a plane.

But that's a completely different story.

Previously? Noises.


July 11, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | family | share[]


EXPECTATIONS


"Sweetie, I really think we should move into a two bedroom."

"What?"

"It's just that this house is so small and we really should be looking for a two bedroom."

"But we only come home to sleep."

"We're here all weekend long."

"When we're not at work."

"This way when my family or your family comes to visit, they can stay in the other room and it won't create the mess it now does in the living room."

"Karen, it would be cheaper for us to pay their hotel each time. Do you really think we need another bedroom?"

Do I? Nope. Of course we don't need another bedroom and the amount of rent saved would easily allow us to go to Turkey once a month. I don't think we should move into a two-bedroom. My mom does.

"Maybe I should take a writing class?"

"What? You don't need a writing class, you just need to write more."

"But I write so badly."

"No you don't and a class won't help that anyway."

"But maybe I cant take a class that tells me what I'm doing wrong or one that helps me find my voice? A class where the teacher can tell me that I should keep trying or just cut my losses and move on."

"Karen, you're fooling yourself. You've already taken all the necessary classes."

Have I? Would a class really help? Nope. Why do I know? Cause I took it. Did I think it was going to help? Nope. But Jake did.

"It's really important that I learn how to speak French better, with a perfect accent."

"I shouldn't quit my job when they think so highly of me."

"Why would I move to California when I'm already so far away from home?"

"I can't be a real writer if I don't like James Joyce or Hemingway."

Who says? Why are other people's thoughts, words, priorities and judgements so important? Why do I hold myself to the expectations of others?

In the blur of other people's conversations and questioning, I've been having a hard time finding my own thoughts. And it's important that I do. It's my life. These are my days on this earth and it's my right to use them up as I wish. As long as I'm not harming others, I should be allowed to execute them according to my own wants.

And I will.

I'm learning to distinguish my voice within the noise.

Previously? Random.


July 10, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | family | share[]


RANDOM


I didn't use to believe in randomness.

As a person who spends too much time on each of her moves, my decisions and choices are never haphazard. I have specific reasons for almost each step and can recite them to you if you so wished. I try to think before I speak and I search for meaning behind my actions. The idea that people do things without thinking never made sense to me.

I can agree that, often times, people aren't aware of their own motives. Many of us are affected by our subconscious and do things because they 'feel right' or 'come naturally'. To me, even forgetting was an active decision. The fact that you forgot to buy a dress of the occasion meant that you secretly didn't want to go at all. I guess I didn't like the idea of taking away credit. Since humans are amongst rare animals that have thought and decision-making capabilities, it didn't make sense that they wouldn't constantly take advantage of their unique capability.

Accepting randomness sounded like a copout to me. Instead of taking responsibility, people got to say "oh, I forgot" or "it didn't mean anything". Everything means something. Things happen for a reason. If you forgot, it most likely wasn't all that important to you in the first place. Instead of hiding behind excuses, I wished people would be bold enough to tell the truth.

"Actually, I don't enjoy going out on Friday nights."

"I'm afraid I didn't like that movie at all."

"I just feel like you always bring me down."

There are better ways to phrase honest sentiments and it's important to do that, but so is not being fake. And I just figured why lie forever when you can tell the truth once and be done with it?

Everything means something.

I'm not sure if I believe that anymore. The above sentence makes it really hard to deal with major calamities beyond your control like murder, rape or losing a baby. I'm adjusting my mind to the fact that sometimes things happen for no reason at all. At least no discernable reason. And it's okay not to know the 'why's.

Sometimes it's best to just move on. To know that something will only affect you if you let it and that you won't.

Maybe entropy is more likely to be the world's model than order, but it still doesn't excuse your not thinking about your actions and words. Next time you run across a situation where you seem to have done something inadvertently, pay attention to your feelings and thoughts.

Maybe you'll discover that the act wasn't so random after all.

Previously? Seed.


July 09, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


TAKEOVER


It all starts with a single seed.

A tiny, imperceptible seed of thought or emotion. An uneasy feeling that you could swear wasn't there a minute ago.

It has no apparent trigger. It's not the outcome of a recent occurrence. It doesn't have any visible relevance to the previous moments of the day.

Like the Big Bang, it expands within you in less than milliseconds. What was an annoying moment becomes an overwhelming state of mind.

There's no going back now. The pull is too strong and it warps everything around it. The word "right" is not a part of your mind's vocabulary anymore.

There are no whites. No goods. No positive sides.

You're in the land of jet black.

The forest is so dense that you can't even see the grass or the road. Everywhere you look is trunks, locking you in like a prisoner.

There is no light. No tunnel. No way out and no way back.

You try to think back to the moment all the grays disappeared but all you can recall is being here, feeling desperate. It's as if you have never been elsewhere. You were born here and you will die here.

You want to yell but words won't cooperate. You want to cry but your eyes are dry. You want to ask for help but there's no one around.

You're alone.

Anger rises within you. "Stop this," you yell at your mind. You think of all the suffering people in the world. The people with real problems.

You start naming the good things in your life, but it doesn't even flinch. The goods morph into not so great. They might even be bad. It has taken over your sense of judgement, perception and memory. It doesn't like to leave loose ends.

Maybe resistance is a stupid idea.

Giving up seems to be the best option. Just thinking about it covers you with a sense of relief. Maybe the dark is not so bad after all. Maybe you've belonged here all along.

The phone rings. You say, "Hello?"

The voice is cheerful. "Hi, honey, just checking up on you."

A single tear escapes.

Previously? Cynical Copout.


July 07, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | emotional | share[]


I DARE YOU


I'm fed up with cynicism.

I didn't really encounter large doses of cynicism until I came to the United States. In college, when people acted bitter and negative, I kept looking for reasons. I couldn't understand why a teenager, attending a decent college with a healthy body and a caring family would have reason to be so scornful. What had already happened in his life to make him so distrustful and so full of hatred?

My childhood, while not uneventful, was pretty decent compared to how it could have been. We had ups and downs but no major calamities. I lived through a divorce and a remarriage, way too much teasing for a soul like mine to handle, and a constant lack of belonging. But I never turned bitter. I'm not asking for a pat in the back. I had other emotions to deal with. I was sad to the point of misery. I chose to run away, leaving behind a family I adored and starting my life all over again. It just never occurred to me to be a cynic.

So for the longest time, I kept thinking that these people must have had a much more miserable life than I had had and that I had no right to judge how they dealt with it. It wasn't like I'd dealt with my issues maturely. Running away hardly deserved praise.

Now that years have passed, I've decided that just like running away, cynicism is total crap. It's useless to the person who hides behind it and to the world in general. Talk about a wasted emotion.

Just like running away, a cynical attitude is a copout. It's choosing to hide behind a mask that will be used as an excuse not to take any responsibility. It's taking the easy way out.

It's so much easier to sit there and complain. It's so much easier to distrust. It's so much easier to hide behind the protective walls of anger.

I've come to believe that having faith is a much harder emotion than lacking it. Not in the religious sense, though that case might apply too, but in the day-to-day interactions. Expecting a person to cross you gives you an excuse to feel justified when the person does, intentionally or not, end up doing something that's not in your favor. When kicked, it's so much simpler to say "See I told you so?" or "What's the point of getting up when I'll end up back down here again?"

What's hard is picking yourself up and trying again. What's hard is trusting others. What's hard is smiling and being happy. Believing in yourself. Believing in others. Believing that there is still so much you can do for the world and having the courage to try.

Recently, I was telling my manager about my intentions of starting a non-profit organization and he kept telling me that it was a waste of my time, my passion, and my intelligence. He said that I can't change the world. I looked at him and simply replied, "You're wrong."

What if everyone felt the way he did?

It's easy to be cynical. It's hard to give it all you got.

I dare you to be happy. I dare you to trust others. I dare you to drop your mask and put yourself out there. I dare you to give it all you got.

I double-dare you.

Previously? More Than Genes

July 05, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | pet peeve | share[]


MORE THAN GENES


I've always been fascinated with how little we know about our parents.

A few years ago, when I first started writing, I went around and asked my friends how their parents had met. Many of them had no idea. (Most of the ones who did, unfortunately had a really boring story, but that's another issue.)

I remember being appalled at how little we knew about the people who brought us into this world and with whom we spent many waking moments of our childhood and adolescence. I'd never thought to ask my grandmother what kind of a daughter my mom was or my father about his memories of boarding school.

As someone who lives really far away from her family, one of my biggest fears has always involved a rapidly spreading disease taking away one of my parents before I had a chance to say goodbye. I specifically didn't say "before I was ready" since I'm not sure I'd ever be prepared for the demise of either of my parents. But the fear of not even making it to Turkey in time used to overwhelm me enough to consider moving back home.

I decided that I wanted to get to know my parents better. Like many caregivers in one's life (i.e. teachers, psychologists, etc.) interaction with parents tends to start as a one-sided relationship. Obviously, in the beginning, you're too small and can't take care of yourself. Your parents are fully focused on you and you're often focused on their focusing on you. You don't spend too much energy trying to figure out what their life outside involves, as you often don't want them to have a life besides the one with you. I'm sure this doesn't apply to everyone. It did to me. I always cried when my parents went out at nights. I wouldn't care what they were going out to do, all I cared was that they were leaving me.

Over the years, my relationship with my parents changed and I found out a lot about their relationship with each other, the early days of their marriage, their family dynamics with their parents and siblings. But I still don't feel like I know my parents as well as I want to.

I often wonder what their aspirations were before they met each other. Did they have another significant other that they almost married? Did they fight as much as my sister and I with their siblings? Do they feel like they've achieved what they set out to do? Did they even set out to do something? Did they always only want to have two kids? What's their happiest childhood memory? What about the saddest?

I just wish I could have met my parents when they were kids. Would I have liked them? Were they too quiet? Too popular? Too geeky? I wish I could know more about their own childhood and pranks and naughty things they did that drove their parents crazy.

So I decided I wanted to take vacations with each parent separately. A week where all we talk about is their childhood. Their life. I feel like if I get to know them better, it won't hurt so much to know that they might not be around forever.

Which is bullshit since it will hurt like mad regardless.

But at least this way I won't feel like I've missed out on the chance of knowing the people whose genetic makeup merged to create me. This way a part of them will live through me and I can tell their stories to my children and my children's children.

This way I won't regret not knowing my parents.

Previously? Artistic Expressions.


July 03, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | family | share[]


ART APPRECIATION


I've always favored high Renaissance art over most other periods.

I think there are two reasons for my fascination and awe with that specific period. The first reason is not specific to the artists of that time, but it was strongly exercised. Most of the elements in the paintings of that time either present a story or have objects which represent icons of some idea or belief.

I'm quite sure I've mentioned previously how I like that this sort of art rewards its viewer for having done his homework. If you know that a pair of shoes symbolizes marriage the painting containing them takes on a new level of meaning for you. I like that almost every item has a purpose. It somehow implies that the artist's job was harder since he had to adhere to certain symbols and tell a specific story and the artists relaying the same story found profoundly differing ways to envision the same scenario.

The other reason I love Renaissance art is the preciseness of the strokes. The realness of the imagery. The incredible resemblance of the picture to an actual scene. It is the lack of that very essence that gave me a dissatisfied feeling when I looked at an impressionist painting. The blurry look made me feel like the painting was unfinished. Like the artist cheated and gave us the feeling of being there without having to work hard to create the details. They lacked the meticulousness I enjoyed.

For me, it was as if the fact that you could replicate real world with its minute detail made you a qualified artist. Cause anyone can splash paint onto an empty canvas, but not everyone can draw the curves of a woman's body or the branches of a tree realistically.

Last week, I went to the Metropolitan Museum and spent a long time looking at the works of some of the most famous impressionist painters. I had never previously seen these works anywhere besides a book. I'd never seen them in their full three-dimensional glory. As I stared at the canvases, I was awed by the dichotomy of the lack of meaning when viewed close-up and the scenery that emerged as I moved back, away from the painting. It seemed that with each stroke, the painter must have always kept the big image in his head and had total control over what the stroke meant for the painting as a whole.

Today I watched one of Jake's friends paint a scene here in Martha's Vineyard with watercolors. I marveled at how quickly a picture emerged with each movement of her brush. I was fascinated at how she wasn't really concerned with each angle being correct and each color matching the world precisely. I loved the idea of letting go of the need to be so tightly coupled with the subject of the painting.

I realized that even my favorite painting style represented something about my personality. That I had enjoyed the methodical, mathematical world of exact replication and symbols over the loose and relaxed. The more I thought about it, the more it felt good to let go. Suddenly, making your own paintings, listening to something from within and combining that with the beauty of nature seemed so much more powerful and rewarding.

Maybe this is how letting go starts: one painting at a time.

Previously? Tradition.


July 02, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | art & music & film | share[]


Tradition

Traditions are at the core of our daily life.

I don't know whether the appropriate word is tradition or ritual but the concept is similar in this context. There are certain things we do every day/month/year on a certain date to celebrate an occasion or to remember something or even to forget.

To me, Jewish religion has always been all about the traditions. My family isn't very religious so I never learned Hebrew. (Well, actually, I did speak it fluently when I was four, but that was mostly cause we spent an entire summer in Israel and I was enrolled in kindergarten, but upon our return to Istanbul I promptly forgot all of it.) We didn't go to synagogue much or light candles on Friday night. But we did observe the major holidays and we told and retold the stories. Today, when someone asks me why I still fast on Yom Kippur or suffer a week without bread during Passover, I can recite the full story of why we observe that specific holiday. I still recognize and appreciate all the people who suffered so that I could be here and I agree with the idea that we need to remember our past and not take things for granted. But, to be honest, I don't observe the holidays for those reasons.

I do it cause it's become a personal tradition.

Both my mom and my sister suffer from health problems that disallow them from fasting. My family is miles away and I am often alone on the eve of Yom Kippur, but I fast. Cause I always have.

It's so engrained at the core of who I am that I don't even see it as an option anymore. It's not something that can be reconsidered; it's a part of me.

But religion is an extreme example for my point. I realized this week that we have little self-traditions that at one point became something that we don't consider from year to year, we just do them. For Jake and me, coming to Martha's Vineyard to celebrate Fourth of July is one of those yearly rituals. The entire family collects at the island house and often there is a guest family as well. It's very low key but it has become a tradition.

I didn't appreciate the strength of this tradition until this year. As I mentioned a few days ago, I recently found out that I most likely have a third herniated disc on my back. My neck is causing large quantities of pain over my back, my arm and my spine in general. I've been depressed and grouchy. So when Jake mentioned our plans, I told him that maybe going to the Vineyard when I felt so crappy wasn't such a good idea.

Hell broke loose. (Well, it didn't. mostly because Jake's such a wonderful person and didn't give me the guilt trip that I was already feeling.) I could tell he was sad but I was so busy feeling sorry for myself that I didn't spend enough time caring about his feelings.

As Saturday got closer and closer, I realized that I got depressed at the idea of not going, too. We always went to the Vineyard this weekend and now I was the reason we weren't going to go. I realized that breaking this tradition meant that I was admitting something was seriously wrong with my body. And I didn't like the idea that something was so wrong that we would alter a tradition. So what if my back hurt some? Staying in New York represented caving into my sickness and it would be downhill from there.

So I didn't.

I bought a neck brace and we took the trip slowly. As I stare out the window to the endless water and trees, I am really glad we came. My back already feels better, my nerves are calmer, the wind is caressing my face and the kitty is giving me curious looks. There's a reason this trip became a tradition.

And you don't mess with traditions.

Previously? Horny.


July 01, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | holidays | share[]
©2009 karenika.com