I've been meaning to write.

Wednesday, I came home and stared at the TV.

Thursday, I fasted all day so I spent half of my day watching TV and the other, sleeping.

Today, it's 9pm and I just got home from Japanese class and I am worn out, tired and my back is exploding with pain.

So you can see that I've accomplished a tremendous amount in the last three days. And since I've had absolutely no intellectual input, it's been hard to produce output.

October is going to be a long month for me. I have applications to fill, essays to write, homework to do, a novel to keep writing, a short story to rewrite and another to write from scratch, GMAT to take, two volunteer jobs to maintain, not to mention my actual paying job. Each time I sit down to make a list, it gets so big that I just turn on the TV and watch it till it's time to sleep.

Of course, my back's acting up again doesn't help matters much.

The good news is that much will change after October. The applications will be finished, the essays and the GMAT will be completed. The novel? Well, the novel will probably still have a long way to go. Come January, things will be even further resolved because I will have received many of the answers.

In the meantime, I need to tear my face away from the TV, try and forget the piercing pain, and do what must be done.

So my writing may suffer in quality (and I will not entertain jokes on how it never had any and all that crap) or it might be intermittent and I apologize in advance. Right now it seems crucial to make sure I can accomplish the goals that will ensure my future and do them well, without affecting my health more. All right, enough cheese. I just got work to do. That's all.

If anything, this entry should make you happy that I'm not writing more often.

I must stop now, the Tivo is calling my name.

Previously? Pursuit of Happiness.

Mondays at 3:45 I was supposed to take a class in Introduction to Theories of Learning. I thought the psychology class would give me a little insight into education theories, but obviously others didn't. I got a call on Thursday to inform me that the class was cancelled.

Since I cannot not take a class, I went through the catalogue and picked the only other class offered at the same time. Another psychology course: Pursuing Happiness. Actually it's a mixture of psychology and philosophy. As part of the teacher's survey of the students, he asked us to write our theory of happiness on the back of an index card.

He said that, in his opinion, everyone has a theory on happiness, on what makes someone happy, what we need to do to be happy. He claimed that people develop this very early on and internalize it. So I thought about mine.

I'll tell you what I wrote on the index card. My theory of happiness is that for a person to be happy, first the 'big' things have to be in place. The big things are: health, financial security, physical safety, etc. You might have other big things or consider some of the ones I mention as not important, but this is my list, so I'm talking about mine.

I think that if you're not healthy, it becomes very difficult to appreciate other aspects of life. Yesterday, I threw out my back and have been in acute pain since, and it has overshadowed all other good things in my life.

Assuming the big things are in place, happiness is celebrating the little things. Most major accomplishments take time, so it's crucial to notice and celebrate minor accomplishments. Happiness is noticing details and appreciating life's little delights. Happiness is accepting others as they are. And accepting yourself as you are while trying to better yourself according to your own standards. It's minimizing the stumbling blocks while maximizing the celebrations of good events. Knowing that life is not a means to an end, but a journey.

That's what I wrote, give or take a few words.

I've been thinking about it since the class. What makes people happy? There are fatalistic theories of life is life and we let it work without struggling too much. Then there are others who believe that life is what you make it and you create your own happiness or lack thereof.

Some people say money makes them happy, but often, those people spend their whole life making the money and no time enjoying it. Do they just like to say they have it or are they doing it as a means to an end? The problem with having big goals (like being rich) is that they are often not well defined (how much money exactly) and they take too long to achieve. What makes me happy often is having a sense of self-accomplishment and self-growth, being loved, loving, and being hugged.

I don't exactly know what my theory of happiness is, I'm still working on developing it. Maybe this class isn't going to be so useless after all.

What's your theory of happiness?

Previously? Thirteen.

It's been thirteen days.

Thirteen.

It doesn't feel right. When I think of that Tuesday morning, it feels like just yesterday. I'm still dazed and confused as if it were yesterday. I'm still numb and awe-struck as if it were yesterday. I'm still unable to work and function as if it were yesterday. I'm still as confused and frustrated as if it were yesterday.

On the other hand, the Monday before feels like centuries away. The team meeting we had on the eleventh seems so far away that I can't recall any parts of our conversation. I can't remember what I did on that Monday. I can't remember what I wore or what I ate. It feels like a hazy part of my past life, not like only a fortnight ago.

When I walked down to the corner of Broadway and Cedar on Thursday, I was amazed at effect of the layers of dust on the surrounding buildings. The area gave a feeling of having been untouched for months, or maybe even years. As if an area time forgot. If it weren't for the workmen, ambulances, and the smoke, I'd have bet it was a site preserved from a historical past. As is, it looked more like a film set than real life.



Two days ago, Jason aimed me to see if we were interested in going to the prayer service in the Yankee stadium with Shannon and him. I'm not religious and Jake's even less religious than I am so I hesitated.

I wasn't sure about the details of the event and thought being in the same place as hundreds of other New Yorkers might help me. I've been having a lot of trouble coming to grips with what's going on. I've had a hard time crying. Or feeling in general. I thought being surrounded by others might allow me to grieve.

After confirming with Jake, I told Jason we'd go.




One side of the stadium spilled with people and the other was completely barren. The home base was covered with flowers and the pitching mound had been converted to a snapshot of the American flag. People were wearing pins and waving flags. Representatives of every religion sat on the L-shaped podium set up in the middle of the field. President Clinton and the New York senator, the governor, the mayor, they were all present. Many people gave inspired speeches. Reassuring the crowd that America was indivisible and that we would rise more powerful from this than before. I choked up several times, but I still didn't cry.

Many representatives of several religions talked about God watching over us and the victims being proud of us, and God protecting us. While some were good speakers, I would lie if I told you that their words influenced me as strongly as the ones of the mayor and, ironically, Oprah. But only two things brought out my tears today: singing of the National Anthem and, much to Jake's dismay, Bette Midler's singing of Wind Beneath My Wings.

It's been thirteen days.

I still haven't really wept. I still can't believe my eyes when I stare at the void in the sky. I still haven't digested any of it. It doesn't feel like thirteen days. On one hand it feels like one hour and on the other it feels like it's been years.

But not thirteen days.

Previously? Two Hours.

A friend of my mother's sent me a presentation on using one's time wisely. The presentation was okay and had some interesting points, and some obvious ones. About twenty slides into the show, a question caught my attention.

If you had two extra hours every day, what would you do with them?

My first instinct was, "I'd write my novel." I've been trying to write this novel for the last year and it's definitely not progressing as quickly as I would like it to. Having left the other one incomplete, I'm scared this book will face the same fate and I really don't want it to.

But then I realized that I put off writing my novel cause it's so hard. It requires a lot of my energy to get it all on paper and I tend to put it off until the last minute, so if I had an extra two hours everyday, I doubt I'd actually spend them on my novel.

My next answer was "I'd read." Another bottomless pit. No matter how much I read, there are always more books to read and I continuously wish for more time. I have a minimum of eight books checked out from the library at any one time and I simply cannot go through them fast enough. Reading was definitely a valid choice for me.

The more I thought about the question, the more I wondered the answers. I wondered what I did with the twenty-four hours I get each day. Don't get me wrong, I maximize my time a lot. In a week, I manage to volunteer in two places, work in an investment bank, take six classes, read two books, write my novel and at least another essay or short story, see a movie, watch twenty hours of TV, write my site at least five times, and sleep a minimum of eight hours. I am not worried that I'm not getting enough done, I'm just curious how many hours of my day each task takes. And if I had two more hours, what would be the best task for me to do?

Hang out with friends more, I think. Most of my friends are just as busy as I am and we rarely seem to see each other as often as we say we want to. If we all had two extra hours, maybe it'd be easier to find the time to meet.

I guess I'm better at making a list of things I wouldn't do with the extra hours. I wouldn't work or sleep. I wouldn't sit on the couch and watch TV. I wouldn't exercise.

The question of what I would do is hard to answer cause I like to do so many things and my list of to-dos never ends. Actually, it never even goes below fifteen items. So another two hours would maybe allow me to keep my list at thirteen items or eleven if I wanted to be optimistic. Which shows me that I am bad at this as I would not appreciate the two added hours as much as I should.

I wonder how many hours would have to be added before I just can't think of anything more to do. Since I adore reading, I venture to say that the answer would be infinite. There aren't enough hours you can add to my day.

I think that says a lot of not so great things about me or my lifestyle, but for now, I am choosing not to concentrate on that too much. Instead, I'm going to go and use the next three hours of my day on a dinner and a movie.

What would you do with an extra two hours each day?

Previously? Normal.

"New York City is getting back to normal," they say. "We really need to get back to the normal," I hear repeatedly.

Yesterday morning, I took the subway down to the financial district. The train slowed down considerably after Brooklyn Bridge and didn't even stop on Wall Street. But it did stop on Whitehall, my exit. As we exited the subway, cops told us to go right. What's usually a hectic street was completely closed off except for a tiny portion of the sidewalk down which we marched like school kids on a museum trip.

As soon as we reached the end of the sidewalk, people rushed into their buildings where another set of cops checked our bags and ids. I pressed the elevator button for the 37th floor, trying to fight back the terrible scenarios that my overactive imagination played. At work, I find out that the stupid virus has caused the firm to shutdown all their internet connections. After I stare at my computer for eight dazed hours, I take a company shuttle up a completely empty FDR drive.

We're getting back to normal, the words echo in my mind.

Today, the subway driver announced right after Fulton that they planned to make the Wall Street stop. I contemplated getting off, but figured walking around Fulton street would be more horrifying then being patient. The train slowed to a stop for a split second and the lights flickered. On a regular day, this is a common occurrence and besides being annoyed at not getting to read my book, I don't think twice. Today, I felt like jumping up and hollering for them to move the damn train.

An hour after I get to work, we start hearing loud bangs. All the employees stare at each other uneasily, each afraid to say the words out loud. We still have no net access and therefore cannot check CNN. We rely solely on the firm notifying us of any news. The bangs come and go intermittently for a few hours. I feel sick to my stomach and decide to take a walk.

We're getting back to normal.

They have opened most of the streets, so I pace up Wall Street and ignore the drizzling rain. I stop in front of the stock exchange to stare at the enormous flag covering the building. My passport might not say so, but I feel American. Even though the rain is getting stronger and my friends advise otherwise, I continue up Broadway. I need to see it, I think to myself. It's important that I do this.

I reach the corner of Cedar and Liberty. Just like fifty others, I stare. The smoke coming out of the ground, the air tasting thick and bitter. I stare at the hole, the cemetery adjacent to the street and the church right next to that. I look at the broken windows in what used to be Jake's workplace. People behind me comment on another building and how it looks like it's expanded in the middle and skewed all over. "Is it an optical illusion?" the man asks. "No, that's the building they kept saying was going to crumble, but it didn't. I think it's damaged, I can't imagine people can work there again," the woman replies.

Getting back to normal.

I take out my aiptek and start shooting pictures. For the last week, this has all felt unreal. As if it was a CNN special. I've been trying to cry, trying to understand, trying to believe. I see the posters all over my neighborhood, the flags on every building, store and person. I hear the hope, withering away. I walk around like a zombie. I stare at the street I stood in every Thursday morning and wonder if it will ever be open again. I look at the names and faces on the posters. People whose only fault was to get to work on time and to help out others. My stomach knots but my eyes are dry. My tears which flood during even a Goldie Hawn movie are refusing to cooperate.

Back to normal.

I don't know what's going on. I don't know if it's over or just beginning. I don't know whether to worry about myself or my family in Turkey. I don't know how many more days I can take the subway. I don't know how much more CNN I can watch. I don't know when I will finally break down. I don't know what this is. But I know what it isn't:

Normal.

Previously? The Big Prize.

The New School Drama School has a very popular program called Inside the Actor's Studio. Yesterday's show was a rerun with the guest as Kevin Spacey.

During the last ten minutes of the show the audience, students, are given ten minutes to ask the guest questions. One of the students asked Kevin what he recommended the students do as they launch into their acting career. He said something along the lines of "what advice do you have for us for the road while we work to reach the prize." Okay, so I don't remember the exact words, but trust me they were something like that. The question doesn't matter, anyway, the answer does.

Kevin Spacey said, "There is no prize." He went on to say many more pithy words that I can not recall. But the first sentence stayed with me.

I spent the last decade of my life trying to reach a prize. A collection of prizes. Getting into college in the United States, graduating with two degrees, securing a job, and my green card. I had so many goals and plans that my friends thought it was impossible to reach them all. But I did. I kept thinking that I had no other choice.

I've read and repeated many of those "don't worry about the past or future but concentrate on today" quotes. I know that the past is past and the future is anyone's guess. But still. I couldn't stop making plans. Until a year ago, I worried that unless I thought about my future, it would never happen. All I needed to do was keep my eyes on the prize and I was sure to earn it.

And I did. I earned them all. I got to come here, I graduated with honors, I got my green card, I even got to work part time when I decided I wanted more than a job. I found myself, at twenty-six, without a prize to work towards. I had collected all the so-called prizes and there weren't any more. None that I cared to have, at least.

It took me more than a decade to realize the four little words Kevin used. Life is not about prizes. Each day is a prize. Each smile, each hug, each touch, each sunrise and sunset. I know it sounds cheesy, but it really is true. Don't get me wrong, I am proud of my accomplishments. I consider my degrees and my green card to be major prizes, but I also recognize that they don't fulfill you in the way you think they will. A green card doesn't suddenly make you stop worrying. It only makes you stop worrying about getting a green card. There is no ultimate prize that makes everything perfect.

My friend Eric's favorite quote was, "Life is what happens to you when you're busy making plans." I'm a planner, it's not possible for me to stop it, but it is possible for me to not create mock prizes. It is possible for me to recognize the value of little daily things. It is possible for me to appreciate the journey. To start paying attention.

And I intend to.

Previously? Safe.

"Yes, thank you. We're alive and okay." I write in another one of the many emails I sent this week.

I'm not complaining. Many friends and relatives have popped out of the blue to ask us how we were doing and I am thankful for their concerns. This is not about how popular I am; it's about the contents of the emails. The words I type and then erase in each letter.

I always start to type "We're alive and safe." But then I delete the last word. It doesn't ring true. Yes, I am alive and my back, neck, and jaw might be in excruciating pain, but none of it matters compared to the fact that I've survived. So I don't whine about my health. I am thankful.

But I don't feel safe. I haven't felt safe since Tuesday morning. For the first few days, I was scared to leave my apartment. And then, we went out and took a long walk. I wanted to get as close as possible to downtown. We walked twenty blocks south to Union Square but couldn't go farther. On Friday, we met a few fellow New Yorkers. The feeling of unease never left me.

On Saturday, we went to the movies. As Keanu Reeves taught several kids how to play baseball, I kept thinking a bomb was going to fall into the theater. What if? I kept asking myself. What if a bomb fell? I had no idea of course. I have no idea. Deep down I know that the chances of a bunch of terrorists bombing my local movie theater are highly unlikely, if not ridiculous, yet I can't get the thought out of my mind.

Today, I walked into a high-rise: a work building in midtown Manhattan. As I rode the elevator to the seventeenth floor, alone, negative thoughts overloaded my mind. I have never suffered from anxiety attacks, but today I got as close to one as I ever remember.

It's been almost a week since the awful day. I've accomplished pretty much nothing in the last week, unless watching CNN can be considered an achievement. In the last two days, I've read a most amazing work of non-fiction about the trials and triumphs of twelve gifted inner-city school students. Their stories are inspiring, disappointing, heart wrenching, uplifting and educational. The writing is captivating and flows effortlessly. I have enjoyed the book thoroughly and learned a tremendous amount. And I'm thankful for the few hours of distraction it gave me.

But I don't think I can feel safe again for a long time. I know this isn't over. I know it barely began. I'm worried about the rest. I'm worried, each night I go to bed, about the world that might wait for me when I wake.

Yes, I am alive, for now. But I am far from safe.

Previously? Motion.

I was writing a short story when disaster struck.

I had about 40 minutes before I had to leave for my volunteer job and I was rushing to finish the story because we were scheduled to dine with a few friends of Jake at 8. I was behind schedule on my things to do for that weekend. I still had to finish the short story, write more words on my novel, finish the book I was reading and start two new ones, essays to write, applications to fill, emails to return. I was stressing out about getting it all done before dinner.

And then the whole world fell apart.

I have spent the last four days on the same couch, alternating between looking at the TV, computer and out the window. Speaking to my family every few hours to make sure we're still alive and trying to register all that's really happening some three miles from my house.

I've sent some forty emails to friends, ensuring we're okay, finding out about them. Each time the phone rings, I still jump, worried about the news it might bear. My family is miles and miles away, in a part of the world that's not necessarily safe. Especially now. But, for once, I'm glad they're not here. I'm not sure what's safe anymore.

I want to turn off the TV and tune out all the horror. I want to curl up into my own world and be glad that it's not missing anything. I want to go out and walk around like things are going to be fine again. I want to move on.

But I can't.

Since Tuesday, besides for groceries, Jake and I have left our house three times. Wednesday night, we went to 'celebrate' my birthday with two friends, four blocks north. On the way back, they were evacuating our neighborhood cause of a bomb threat at the Empire State building. The second time, on Thursday, for lunch mostly cause I was going insane indoors and Jason ordered me to turn off the TV and go out. And yesterday, to meet with a bunch of webloggers in New York City. I have had an entire week to catch up on my to-dos.

But I did nothing.

Even now, I open my book and my eyes glance over the few lines. Within seconds, I close it back up. I can't concentrate. I switch between the news channels, crying at the stories of strangers filing reports eight blocks south of our house. I call all the numbers they announce on TV but they're already filled up with volunteers. 'Call back tomorrow,' they say.

I reopen the Word file and stare at the line I left in mid-sentence on Tuesday.

Previously? Quiet.

Is "healthy competition" an oxymoron?

A movie I watched today, made me wonder about the negative effects of competition. By definition, a competition has winners and losers. One winner and many losers. That means one person feels great and many people feel lousy.

So what's the point?

How come competition is so encouraged? How come we glorify winning? How come kids are singled out by the teachers and coaches as special? How is this constructive?

I imagine that people who approve of competition may say that the drive to win encourages you to improve yourself. While on the surface that may appear to be the case, the reality of the situation differs greatly. If Joe is a star football player and Moe is the second-best, Moe doesn't really care to be a better player, he just cares to outperform Joe so that he can be the star. It's no longer about the game, it's about Joe. About beating Joe. If Joe were to suddenly transfer to another school, Moe no longer cares to improve his game because he has no one to worry about. I agree that if Joe and Moe are in the same school, Moe might improve his game, but I think we undermine the importance of the underlying motive.

I truly believe in the saying "No man is an island." We don't live alone and the world is not a race. It's a society, a community and it needs harmony, not competition.

Imagine you're an amazing baseball player. One of a kind. In a team, you're most definitely the star. Now imagine, no team member will play with you. Maybe you're really cocky, or just an ass, or maybe you show off too much. Whatever the reason may be, others will not play with you. Suddenly, your talent is not so useful. Since baseball is a team game, and no one will play with you, you're unable to play. So obviously, the world is not your mountain.

Yet the schools encourage competition even at an early age. Spelling bees, assembly awards. So do sports. What's the purpose of competitive sports at a young age? At an age where the kids cannot understand the difference between "just getting the other guy out of the picture" and "being the best I can be." What's the value in making a seven year old feel like a loser? Singling a kid out. Causing the children to view their classmates as people they have to beat to get ahead.

Yet the world often operates because everyone plays his part. We learn to work with others to deliver big projects, ones we couldn't have completed on our own. We team up with other people who have similar interests or beliefs to start organizations. Almost every major change in the world is the result of a team, not one person.

So why not encourage teamwork instead?

Previously? Blank Slate.

"Gordon focused on a seeming oddity first noticed by the linguist Paul Kiparsky; compounds can be formed out of irregular plurals but not out of regular plurals. For example, a house infested with mice can be described as mice-infested, but it sounds awkward to describe a house infested with rats as rats-infested. We say that it is rat-infested, even thought by definition one rat does not make an infestation. Similarly, there has been much talk about men-bashing but no talk about guys-bashing, and there are teethmarks, but no clawsmarks. Once there was a song about a purple-people-eater, but it would be ungrammatical to sing about a purple-babies-eater. Since the licit irregular plurals and the illicit regular plurals have similar meanings, it must be grammar of irregularity that makes the difference.

...

Gordon found that three- to five-year-old children obey this restriction fastidiously. Showing the children a puppet, he first asked them, "Here is a monster who likes to eat mud. What do you call him?" He then gave them the answer, a mud-eater, to get them started. Children like to play along, and the more gruesome the meal, the more eagerly they fill in the blank, often to the dismay of their onlooking parents. The crucial parts came next. A "monster who likes to eat mice," the children said, was a mice-eater. But a "monster who likes to eat rats" was never called a rats-eater, only a rat-eater. (Even the children who made the error mouses in their spontaneous speech never called the puppet a mouses-eater.) The children, in other words, respected the subtle restrictions on combing plurals and compounds inherent in the word structure rules. This suggests that the rules take the same form in the unconscious mind of the child as they do in the unconscious mind of the adult.

...

The children produced mice-eater but never rats-eater, even though they had no evidence from adult speech that this is how languages work.Gordon's mice-eater experiment shows that in morphology children automatically distinguish between roots stored in the mental dictionary and inflected words created by a rule." - The Language Instinct by Steven Pinker

Parents and teachers historically tend to operate under the belief that babies and children do very little thinking of their own. Or that kids' minds are blank slates when they are born and when they start school. It's a common belief that children learn their mother tongue by repeating what the mommy and daddy say. Teachers assume that their first graders take their teacher's word for facts about science.

Yet, none of the above assumptions is true.

There is increasing evidence to the contrary. One-year-olds might be born with a certain grammatical structure or they might be developing it instead of merely imitating mommy's words. First graders already have ideas on why we can see an object and how darkness affects our vision. No matter how 'clearly' a teacher might explain a scientific fact, it often doesn't override the misconceptions the child has already built in his head.

It seems to me that we underestimate children. We never even think to ask them if they have an idea on why the sky is blue or what makes a seed grow into a tree. We assume they don't know until we teach them.

And you know what happens when you assume, don't you?

Previously? Intents.

What if I promise that I will respond to your email, but never do?

Would you get mad? Would you be frustrated? Would you think I'm inconsiderate? Thoughtless? Snotty?

What if you then find out I meant to write back to you? I truly intended to, but something happened. Life got in the way. Or I didn't reply because I've been sick. Overwhelmed at work. Out of the city. Depressed.

Does that change your feelings about me and my not having replied to your email?

How much does intent play into your judgement of my behavior? Do you care only about the outcome regardless of what I meant to do? Or do you care that I had noble intentions?

In law, intent plays a crucial role. One of the biggest differences between murder one and the different kinds is intent. "Did you actually plan to kill this person?" is an important question and distinction that the government recognizes.

Yet, in our day to day life we don't pay much attention to intent. We're very much about the "bottom-line." We rarely give people the benefit of the doubt. If we get no reply to an email, we assume the person is blowing us off. We judge the person's character on that behavior. Or lack thereof.

So which one matters more?

I know the answer's going to be "it depends." Almost nothing in life is black and white. There are often cases where we might change our values or beliefs. Maybe we can only make a call on a case by case condition. Maybe it depends on what stopped me. If I was sick, it might have more of a bearing on your forgiving me than if I had work to do. Or maybe it depends on the nature of the act. Not replying to email might not be the end of the world, whereas not showing up for your wedding is more hurtful and therefore less forgivable regardless of my intent.

I don't have the answers.

Do you?

How much do my intentions really matter?

Previously? The Burn.

In November of 1999, I was asked to go on a six-month business trip to Japan. At the time, my situation at work was so bad that I knew I needed to get away. I agreed to go to the other side of the world and told myself that no matter what, I would find a way to resolve the issues before I returned to New York City.

I went to the bookstore by my house and bought a collection of soft covers designed to tell me my purpose in life. What color was my parachute? Was I destined to be an actor? A mathematician? Social worker? What was my dream job? I wanted answers and these books promised to deliver.

And I can't, in good conscience, say that they didn't. For me to claim the books were no good, I would have had to use them. I cracked the cover of a few, but I didn't make it all the way in any of them. I guess I wasn't motivated enough to find out my true calling. Which is a little odd, considering how bad things really were.

I'm not exactly sure what stopped me. I think it was partly the canned exercises that seemed pointless and partly the fact that I already knew most of my strengths. But mostly because I didn't care for the way they categorized people. I don't like being labeled "perceiving" vs. "judging" or "extrovert" vs. "introvert". I believe the real world is much more complicated than that. There are times when I think more and times when I depend on my feelings to guide me. It depends on the situation, the people involved, the state of mind I'm in and many other factors. I got frustrated not being able to answer the questions and gave up.

Which, in the end, turned out to be the best move.

I came back to New York and decided to change my job and my schedule so I'd have more free time to explore some of my other interests. In the year that I've been back, I've figured out the best test. It stems from one single word. The answer to what your calling really is lies in the answer to this sentence:

What are you passionate about?

Which can be rephrased as: What moves you? What do you enjoy doing most? What can't you stop thinking about? What would you spend all your time doing if you didn't need to worry about money? What feels more like play than work?

These are all ways to ask the same question. There are many reasons a job might not work out for you. A bad manager, unbearable work mates, obscene hours, undesirable location, too much travel, not enough travel, not enough mobility, etc. These are issues that might cause you to change firms, departments or locations, but not careers.

I think what defines the best career for you is the thing you're most passionate about. It can be something that's directly tied to the job like being an artist cause you're passionate about painting. Or something that indirectly allows you to reach your passion, like being an investment banker cause you're passionate about being rich. Once you can honestly admit to yourself what your true passion is, setting the path to reach it is inconsequential.

I'm not saying it's easy. If you're passionate about art, money might not come easily and therefore you might get discouraged following your passion. Or that it has to be a single thing. You might have several things and then you'd try to find a way to combine them. Or your passion might change and you might need to alter your life completely. Either way, I think that once you know your passion, you're much more likely to find happiness and success.

Here are a few items on my "passion list":
Learning
Reading
Helping Others
Technology

What's on yours?

Previously? The Other Way.

Ignorance is not bliss.

A while back I wrote about the importance of letting go, or temporarily ignoring, issues that come up in a relationship, especially the not-so-important ones. I still believe in the necessity of not making a mountain out of every little detail.

The ignorance I'm talking about here is in a completely different context.

I'm referring to the world and community in a bigger scale. I'm talking about issues such as education, recycling, racism, preserving our forests, world peace and much more. Many of us operate within the thought patterns of "If it's not affecting me directly, I don't need to do anything about it." We blissfully ignore problems that fall outside our own community, our daily lives.

If we don't fall in the above category, we often fall in the other major one. There are many of us who acknowledge and understand the severity of some of the problems facing the world. Some of us even take the time to educate ourselves about them. Yet most of us do nothing about it. We use the excuse that the problems are too big for one person to resolve. We hide behind the historical evidence of people who've tried unsuccessfully.

It's much easier to ignore than to have tried and failed.

But this is our world. These issues, however much you might feel don't affect you today, might become crucial in your life tomorrow. You might not care about education in America until you have a child who ends up in the public school system. You might have never considered the difficulties faced by a handicapped person until, by some terrible misfortune, you or a loved one becomes handicapped.

And then there are those whose effects we might never see firsthand. You might never realize the full disastrous outcomes of deforestation or global warming since they might take years, decades, or sometimes centuries. Does that mean you shouldn't do all you can to stop these from getting out of hand? Do you not care about the effects it might have on your grandchildren, or great-grandchildren?

It's true that some of these issues might take centuries and hundreds, or even hundreds of thousands, of people to resolve. Some might never get resolved. Does that mean we shouldn't even try? While we might not avert the potential disaster, we might be able to put it off for another hundred centuries, by which time science might allow for us to have the answers.

Or we might not. Maybe they will never get better. Maybe we're doomed to have racism or mediocre education.

Or maybe we're not.

We will never know till we try. Every movement starts with the first step. And you cannot take the first step if you're ignoring the issues.

For me, it's time to hit the books, the news, the essays. Anything to educate myself on the problems. Once I know the problems, I might be able to come up with answers.

For me, it's time to stop looking the other way.

Previously? Know It All.