karenika
big sur
archives • main
REJECTION
Before we had kids, Jake and I used to go back to Istanbul regularly. Each time we went home, my parents would take me to a new local place and we would always run into people I knew. Always. Istanbul has over 12 million people. Yet we would run into the same people over and over again.

I was flabbergasted by this. Until, I realized, of course, that the people I knew all went to the same few places. This is always the case in a small community. People tend to go to the same places, know the same people, like the same things, and talk about the same issues. Therefore, it should not have surprised me to run into the same people everywhere I went, even in a city with a population of 12 million. It's like a sub-culture within a big, dense city.

Yet, when the exact same thing happened lately, I failed to recognize it again. The web is even more populated than Istanbul (by quite a bit) yet it felt like everyone whose site I read knew each other. Everyone I was following on Twitter was talking about each other. It felt like I was a voyeur into someone else's popular clique and I kept feeling like an outsider. Like the rejected girl (as I often have felt in my life.)

Until I realized that the same phenomenon that happened in Istanbul was happening here. I kept running into the same people because I found them by clicking on each other's blogs. I followed them because one person I followed was following them, etc. Since they referred to each other often (as they are friends) I had soon built a long list of people who were already connected and built that list exactly because they were connected and then I proceeded to forget all about this and feel like an unpopular kid (those childhood feelings are hard to disappear and come back rushing very quickly).

Like Istanbul, the web has niches. In these niches some people are wildly popular even though no one has heard of them outside this relatively small niche. Yet, if you're observing this niche, it's really quite easy to lose perspective of it all. And to think this person is more unreachable (untouchable) than they really are. in the end, this is just a bunch of friends who all happen to have blogs, twitter accounts, etc. who are using these popular forms of communication to document and keep in touch with each other. The only difference here is that tens, thousands, millions of people get to observe this if they so choose. This creates an interesting dynamic. One that I am still thinking about and trying to see how I feel about. I am trying to remind myself that this is not me getting rejected. This is a bunch of people I don't know sharing a piece of themselves and letting me read it.

I am not sure what my point is here, of course. Some days, I feel really sad and want to unfollow many of these people. Then I remember that I chose them cause I like their words, the way they encourage me to think and ponder. And the feeling of rejection is really just living inside me, not coming from these people. Even though I know this, it still sometimes hurts.

November 17, 2009 | link | random thoughts | share[]


LEAVING A MARK
There are some people who come into your life during important stages in your life. People whom you will always remember even though they may not remember your name a year from now. For example, I remember the name of each person who interviewed me for my job at Google (and there were many of them.) I have, over the three years, run across many of them and they don't remember me, yet I know I will never forget them.

Same goes for the person who did my college interview or the person who sold me my first car, etc. The person who told me about Carnegie Mellon some twenty years ago. I bet he has no idea that he has completely changed the course of my life. I owe my education, my husband, my career, in part to him and his having mentioned the school to me all those years ago. These one-sided experiences always fascinated me.

Yesterday, I was talking to one such person. A woman who's helping me through another huge life moment. I told her how thankful I am for her help and how I will remember her forever. I said, "I know I am one of many for you because this is what you do, but you are and will always be special to me." She was touched and thanked me.

I wonder if people realize and appreciate the effect they might have on others. The tiny comment that might turn someone's life around. Something you do as part of your job might actually leave a lasting spot in someone else's journey. Isn't that magical?

I think we don't tell enough people how they've changed our lives. Imagine if someone told you about such a thing today. How something that was insignificant/effortless to you (something you likely don't even remember) actually left a permanent mark in their life. Wouldn't it be great to hear that. A bit scary maybe, but really awesome in a way that would put a smile on your face and remind you that your reach in this world is much wider than you imagine.

So take a moment today and thank someone who did that for you. Don't be embarrassed. Don't worry about how they might take it. Don't expect a response. Just do it. Maybe, just maybe, you might make someone's day.

June 11, 2009 ~ 20:06 | link | random thoughts | share[]


YES OR NO
I just realized Shimelle was still posting blog prompt but I was not getting them, so this is going to be my attempt to catch up on them. Let's see how well I do.

Tuesday: When was the last time you said yes to something new? Share that experience and what you learned with your readers.

This is an excellent question. It's been a long long long time since I said yes to something new and interesting or challenging on a personal level. I should think about this some more. I have said no to some things which is good for me since I am not so good at saying no so I am proud of that.

Professionally, I agreed to help out with a new product which stresses me out a bit but it's also made me excited to be learning new things and I am quite happy about that.

Wednesday:Tell your blog readers about a time when you suddenly had more confidence than you expected -- maybe in replying ‘yes’ or ‘no’!

For me, this was accepting to take a six-month business trip to Japan. Logically, I thought it was crazy and I didn't really want to do it. But emotionally and especially in my gut, I really wanted to do it. I knew I was going to do it so I put all my logic aside and jumped in with both feet.

It turned out to be a really good idea and I am eternally grateful that I trusted my gut.

Thursday:What’s one thing in your daily routine that you would happily say ‘no’ to if you had the option to magic it away?

Work? Hmmm, other than that, lately it's been putting suntan lotion on David every morning. I really dread it for some weird reason.

August 07, 2008 ~ 18:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MAKING A LIFE
Today's prompt from Shimelle: Share a story with your readers about one moment when you felt independent and in control.

I've had a few such luxurious moments in my life. When I moved to the US from Turkey. I was really homesick for a few weeks but overall I was much more in my element in the US than I ever felt in Istanbul. I had a similar feeling when I graduated and moved to New York, when I had my own apartment, my own job, and just my own life. I love it. Even now. I am scared to do something to rock things but I do have a very nice life and I feel lucky to be able to be independent (or feel that way even with a 3 year old.). I love my life. I love my family. I love that I made this life. We made it. It's really magical.

I've always, always wanted to make my own choices. Ever since I can remember and I love making them.

August 01, 2008 ~ 16:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


JUST WAIT A WHILE
Thursday's prompt from Shimelle was:What do you do when don’t feel very creative or feel like you’ve hit a creative block? Share a few tips that help you get back to yourself.

Honestly, I think the best thing is to walk away. Wait until the next wave of creativity comes and don't force yourself. Or just to play with no plan in mind and see what happens. In the ideal world of no deadlines, I think that's the best thing to do. Give yourself permission to rest. Relax. Rejuvenate. If only I took my own advice.

August 01, 2008 ~ 16:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


NOT YOUR TYPICAL TEENAGER
Wednesday's prompt from Shimelle was: Who was your personal favourite teeny-bopper pin-up? Share a story about that dreamboat or another happy teenage memory with your readers.
This one didn't make me think a long while. I didn't even have one poster in my room as a teenager. I have never been that type of girl. I think that's one of the reasons I was so miserable in Turkey. I just didn't fit into the tiny community I was stuck with. I also don't really equate teenage with fun. Then again, I did have a few good, solid friends. One of whom I will be talking about in this week's creative therapy piece. The few friends I did have, I still cherish wholeheartedly.

August 01, 2008 ~ 16:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


WHAT TO READ
Today's post from Shimelle is: What’s your favourite reading material? Like the kind of favourite that you would take it to read if you had to cut off the rest of the world for years and years?

This one is easy for me. Fiction. I love reading fiction. Just about any mainstream fiction will do. I don't read genres that often so no fantasy, romance, or horror. Rarely science fiction or mystery. No historical fiction. But I will pick a good story over just about anything else. My requirements for locations where I am willing to live depend on where Amazon delivers.

I am constantly looking for new books and new authors. Not new, per se, but new to me. Any suggestions?

July 29, 2008 ~ 18:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


INSPIRATION AT HAND
Tell your blog readers about someone who has been a creative influence in your life -- a crafty mum, aunt or grandparent, an influential school teacher or a friend who brought out your creative side, perhaps.
Wow this one is actually a loaded question for me funny enough. My mom is an amazingly talented person. She is a true artist in my mind but she's never been an artist by profession. She was an art restorer for a long time and then a jewelry designer and now she's an interior decorator. But instead of it all inspiring me, it's always intimidated me. I always knew I just didn't have whatever gene it was that you needed. I've always craved being artistic. I've always wished I was naturally talented at it. But oh well, I am good with computers.....

July 28, 2008 ~ 21:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MOUSSE AU CHOCOLAT
Friday's prompt from Shimelle is: What was your favourite treat as a child? What is it now? Share the story behind your favourite treats (be they sweets or luxuries) with your readers to see if they share your tastes.

Well when I first read this, I thought of bubble baths. I used to take these bubble baths where I had music playing, a bowl of fruit floating, and a fantastic book. I loved them. The second time I read it, I immediately thought of chocolate. My grandmother makes this amazing Chocolate Mousse. It's mouth watering. Even now, when I visit home, it's the first thing she makes for me.

I don't have either today but I am still addicted to chocolate. Especially Lindt Lindor. It's the very very best!

July 26, 2008 ~ 23:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


TECHNIQUES
Thursday's prompt from Shimelle is: What artistic technique do you love but not use often? What artistic technique intimidates you? Maybe you’ll find an expert in that technique reads your blog and can comment with tips for you!

A great question as always. There are too many for me. Sewing. Vintage. Painting. I would love to do any of these. They all intimidate me. Especially the drawing. I so wish I could draw and paint better. I've also always wanted to make a quilt.

July 26, 2008 ~ 23:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


CAT'S CRADLE
Here's Shimelle's prompt from Wednesday: If there was just one thing from your youth that you could pass on to today’s younger generation what would it be? Something as simple as the original Sesame Street theme song or something more complex, like growing up more slowly?

For some odd reason, the very first thing that came to my mind was Cat's Cradle.


My sister and I played this game for hours when we were kids and I loved it so much. Thinking of it makes me think of being a kid. In that non-electronic, non-email way. Like jumping rope which I also loved.

July 26, 2008 ~ 23:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


WORKING GIRL
Today's prompt from Shimelle is: Write about your first job and ask your blog readers to share their first job stories too.

Another interesting one for me. In Turkey, it's not common for teenagers to work like it is in the US. So I never had a real paying job until I moved to the US. It all depends what first job means to you. The first time I got paid for doing something was proofreading for the college newspaper. The first "corporate" job I had was for Bell Laboratories my Junior year in college. I was a programmer. And the first "real/fulltime" job I had was as a programmer at Goldman Sachs. Most of my career has been about programming or managing people who are. Now I manage products and not people, but it's still about the code I suppose. I had a brief period where I taught 5th grade which was the most interesting and the most dreadful year of my life.

So I guess, career-wise, my life hasn't been incredibly interesting. But it's also not horribly boring. Something in between. I've almost always been lucky enough to work for reputable companies and with intelligent people. I can't ask for more.

Well I can. But not yet.

July 22, 2008 ~ 22:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


FUN GAMES
Today's prompt from Shimelle is: Tell your blog readers about your favourite game.

This was an interesting one for me. I used to love playing games. Backgammon. Bridge. Scrabble. Cards. But since I met Jake, we play almost nothing. Backgammon really really rarely and every now and then I meet with my Google friends to play Mahjongg (which I do love). And even more rarely, I play board games with my friend Cole. But I do miss playing games. Especially cards. I've always liked them. I need to find a way to bring this back into my life.

July 21, 2008 ~ 18:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


STOP AND START
And finally the prompt from today: The things that inspire us are often linked to what we label as quirks in our personalities: things we like that others seem to dismiss. What quirk could you share with your blog readers to see if they really dismiss this or if it’s something you have in common?

Well I don't know if it's a quirk but I can never leave an art piece unfinished. Not a layout. Not a journal page. Nothing. I can't leave it there and come back to it later. I have to do it all the way. Now or never. I used to think that this was a bad thing. That it was a sign that I could never be an artist. Artists can walk away from their art and come back to it but since I can't, it's another sign that I'm not really an artist and won't be one.

Then, yesterday, an artist that I admire greatly made a post that talks about some of her life and art. She said this:

DO YOU EVER STOP AND START A PIECE OVER BECAUSE OF HOW IT'S EVOLVING OR NOT EVOLVING? No. I push through it. Art is about what is happening right now. IT IS WHAT IT IS IN THE MOMENT I WAS CREATING IT. And that could be crap. But, if I stop a piece I will likely never go back.

And it immediately made me feel better. Maybe there was a chance for me afterall.

July 17, 2008 ~ 08:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


THE PAST AND THE FUTURE
The prompt for yesterday was: Choose one point on each line to share with your blog readers - one thing you have accomplished and one thing you hope to accomplish. Bonus points if you have a photo from the event on the first line.

I thought about this a while ago and I've decided that my biggest accomplishment was getting into Carnegie Mellon and getting to come to the United States. That's where all the rest of my accomplishments started. My citizenship. Teach for America. Jake. David. Goldman. Google. None of it would have happened without moving to the United States for college.

As for the second line, I guess one of my current aspirations is to complete a full painting. I'm working on it and taking a class but it's not something I'm inherently talented at so it requires a lot of effort.

July 17, 2008 ~ 07:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


CURRENT INSPIRATION
Here's the prompt from Tuesday's Freedom class: Share a list of links with your blog readers, leading them to the websites that inspire you most.
Let's see: chromasia, Paulette, BPS , Becky and Shimelle and on my list this week.

July 17, 2008 ~ 07:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW
I am catching up to all the "Freedom" prompts so you will see three in a row. Here's the one from Monday: Share an old photo of yourself and a current photo of yourself with your blog readers. Tell them a little something that has changed and a little that has stayed the same.

Here's the first photo that came to my mind. One from a long time ago:



And One from May of this year:



Let's talk about what's changed:
Hair Color. Hair Length. Weight (Free food is great but not for your weight.) New York vs Palo Alto. Goldman vs Google. Coding vs Not So Much. Single vs Married. Not a Mom vs a Mom. Back then I didn't have a fancy camera and wasn't nearly as into photography as an art. I hadn't begun scrapping. I was writing novels. I had never gone camping. I didn't really know how to drive. Creative Therapy.

Let's talk about what hasn't changed:
Working. Trying to balance it all out. Trying to figure things out. Taking photos. Reading. Blogging. Jake. Many of my friends. Pursuit of Happiness and Peace.

July 16, 2008 ~ 19:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


SOAK IT IN
Friday's Freedom prompt: How do you prefer the pace of life? Do you wish things would speed up or slow down? Illustrate with something that has been on your mind or on your calendar or share your preference between working slowly or quickly on a crafting project.

This one is interesting to me because I've been thinking about it a lot lately. When I decided to move to San Diego from New York, everyone told me I'd hate it. They said the ultra-type-A me would go insane with the relaxed Southern California pace. Honestly, I was a bit worried, too.

There were many reasons why I missed NYC when I was in San Diego but the pace wasn't one of them. I loved being relaxed. I love walking on the beach and taking my time to let the nature soak in. When we moved to Palo Alto and I went back to the crazy busy life style, I missed San Diego immediately. I still do.

Yet when I scrap or paint, I still have the fast pace. It's like I must finish. I can't imagine how some people leave stuff to simmer overnight. I could never ever imagine doing that. I think this attitude hurts my art. Doesn't give me time to slow down and think things through. As I told myself at the beginning of this year: it's not about the end goal; it's about the journey.

Since life is all about the journey, why not savor each moment?

July 13, 2008 ~ 21:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


POEMS
Today's blog prompt from Shimelle is: Have you ever been inspired by the words of a poem? Share the poem with your blog readers and tell them how you came to value its words.

If you'd asked me years ago, I'd have said Nothing Gold Can Stay or later, I would have said, Stop all the Clocks or i carry you in my heart or One Art. But the first poem that jumped to my mind was:

This is Just to Say by William Carlos Williams
I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox

and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast

Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold

I love this poem. I love every bit of it. I can't even explain why. Maybe cause it's so ordinary. Cause it's so relateable. So daily life. I am not sure but it makes me happy each and every time.

July 10, 2008 ~ 15:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MUST-HAVES
Ok running behind already. Yesterday's My Freedom class prompt is: Play a game of ‘What’s in your suitcase?’ on your blog by listing your necessities for travel, then ask your blog readers to comment with their own list. You can include pictures or links for items you consider must-haves.

Well this is a boring one for me. My must-haves are all electronic equipment and books. I must have: iPod, MacBook Pro, Canon SLR, Canon mini camera, iPhone, all the chargers. Then I take at least three books. Even if I'm going just for two days. Three books is my minimum. Then I'll take whatever I'm working on currently. Like a sketchbook, or a recent class printout, or papers that have been sitting on my desk, unread. That's about it for me. Boring, eh?

What about you?

July 10, 2008 ~ 15:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MY FREEDOM - DAY TWO - TIME TRAVEL
The prompt for the second day of Shimelle's My Freedom class is "If you could travel in time for just one day, where would you go and what would you do?"

My first thought was to go back in time. Back to my wedding day. The day I met Jake. The day we first kissed. The day I found out about David. The day I gave birth to David. My swearing in ceremony. My telegram of acceptance in to Carnegie Mellon. Walking on campus for the first time. So many memorable moments in the past.

Then I realized maybe I could go into the future. The prompt doesn't mention the past specifically. Maybe I could go to David's wedding day. Or when we are retired. Or when my next kid is born. Maybe just go ten years into the future and see how things work out. Or maybe not. I've never been a fan of wanting to know the future. Too scared. Also, it's no fun. What's the point if you already know how things are going to work out? So the future is out.

I know I could have thought in the historical sense too but I've never been a fan of history. So that's that.

Then I thought, hmmm, do I get to go back as the now me and speak to the then me? Can I give me some advice? How about some consolation? Can I tell the "past-me" that I will actually get into the college of my dreams. Or that I'll get this job or that I will find the man of my dreams. Can I tell her things are going to work out? But isn't that cheating? Would the past-me believe the present-me? Should she? Hmmm that got too complicated too.

So how about just going back to observe. Like to my wedding day, which I mostly don't remember. But my logic kicked in again and said that sometimes the way we remember things is more important than the way they actually were. Memory does what it does for a reason. So that was out too.

I guess I am just not traveling in time after all. Well, maybe to the far far future where I will be dead and I get to come back once more just to see my kids and give them one more hug. Is that fair? Since this is my imagination, I say it is.

July 08, 2008 ~ 15:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


I NEED TO DO THIS MORE OFTEN
From Hey World, Here I am! by Jean Little:

Today
Today I will not live up to my potential.
Today I will not relate well to my peer group.
Today I will not contribute in class.
I will not volunteer one thing.
Today I will not strive to do better.
Today I will not achieve or adjust or grow enriched or get involved.
I will not put up my hand even if the teacher is wrong and I can prove it.

Today I might eat the eraser off my pencil.
I'll look at clouds.
I'll be late,
I don't think I'll wash.

I need a rest.


July 07, 2008 ~ 20:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


IMPORTANCE OF REST
One of the things I learned in the Managing Your Energy class I took over a month ago was the importance of resting and recovering. The teacher mentioned how the difference between good athletes and top-notch athletes was not how well they played the sport but how quickly they recovered. How much time they needed to rest.

I've always been a Type A. I don't do that well with resting and relaxing. I don't often stop and smell the flowers. I think sleep is over rated. I believe in go-go-go. So much so that when my friends first heard I was moving to San Diego (five years ago), they thought I might go insane and want to come back to New York immediately.

They weren't totally wrong.

But San Diego did wonders for my state of mind. It taught me to relax. It showed me the joys of nature and photography and then, of course, David came. And then I came to Google and life went right back to go-go-go, busy-busy-busy, and now-now-now. Until I took the class.

In the last month, I've been practicing being relaxed. Resting. Doing nothing and not feeling bad about it. Giving myself permission to lie in bed a few more minutes. To let go of that to-do list item. To not reply to that email. To sleep a full eight hours. I feel much better. I still get a lot done and I forgive myself for the rest.

And amazingly, the world doesn't seem to come to an end.

April 06, 2008 ~ 19:04 | link | random thoughts | share[]


WINNER BY ELIMINATION
Crap.

Crap. Crap.

So Jake and I have been watching the Tour De France. We got hooked on the Tour four years ago. We watched it minute by minute in 2004 and 2005. Last year we missed it because we were in Turkey, but this year, we upgraded our Dish subscription just so we can get Versus and we've been watching it since day one.

So, of course, we started by rooting by Leipheimer. But then he was obviously not going to make it and while I loved Rasmussen's drive, I was still rooting for The Discovery Team, so Contador it was. During today's stage, I kept waiting for Contador to take off. Waiting and waiting and waiting. And then Rasmussen took off. And I got bummed.

So you'd think that once I read the news about Rasmussen being fired by his team (due to lying about where he was and missing drug tests), I'd be dancing on my coffee table.

But I am not.

I wanted Contador or Levi to win because they deserved it and because they rightfully beat Rasmussen by riding faster for the time trial or something like that. Not that they don't deserve it but this is such a bummer way.

It's all so sad. Rasmussen. Vinokourov. Moreni. Not to mention all those who were suspended last year and didn't even get to ride this year. Why, oh why?

I was looking forward to tomorrow's time trial very much, especially since it's not Rasmussen's forte and it might have changed the race. But now looks like Contador will win by elimination. Not really the way I wanted it to turn out. Reduces the excitement considerably.

What a bummer.

July 25, 2007 ~ 23:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


REAL ME VS IDEAL ME
Many years ago, I wrote an entry about the two-me's. Lately, the idea of the Ideal Self has been on my mind a lot. There have been many occasions where I noticed that my ideas of who I hope to be in a certain situation often get crushed by the real me.

The Ideal Me wants to be mature in a situation that might be chaotic and frustrating but the Real Me gets annoyed, acts impatient or irrational. The Ideal Me wants to explain things clearly and without placing blame so we can have a productive conversation and resolve our differences, yet the Real Me gets emotional and can't think clearly. The Ideal Me assumes the best and commits to situations where the Real Me freaks out and makes things unpleasant without meaning to. The Ideal Me is kind and compassionate regardless of how others treat me, but the Real Me gets hurt and angry. The Ideal Me wants to make everyone happy but the Real Me knows that's impossible and often ends up upsetting everyone instead.

This has caused numerous problems in my personal life, in my work life, in my friendships and relationships. Most significantly, it has made me feel like I am continuously letting myself down.

After countless recent such events, I have realized that it's time to cut myself some slack and to start becoming more realistic about who I am, what I can do and what I'd rather not. With a new job and a growing family, time is quite rare. As I grow older and more responsible, I need to learn to be who I am. I need to learn to graciously decline, even at the cost of upsetting people I love. I know that, otherwise, they will get much more upset when I do something to please them and end up feeling resentful and frustrated. I need to learn that people get over things relatively quickly and those who harbor resentment for not getting their way aren't worth dealing with.

I need to learn that there's nothing wrong with the Real Me and that when the Ideal Me starts taking over, I need to pay attention and make sure that the Real Me can deliver the promises the Ideal Me makes.

August 13, 2006 ~ 12:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


WAITING
My heart jumps each time the phone rings. Sinks each time it's not "the call."

I check my mail incessantly, hitting refresh in millisecond increments. If I leave home for an errand or go to the bathroom, I travel with all the phones. I rush back to the computer hoping it came in the two minutes I wasn't clicking.

I create the worst possible scenario in my mind and get myself all wound up. Why did I even think it was possible? Who am I kidding really?

I listen to an uplifting song and get my second wind. Maybe not hearing soon is actually a good sign. Maybe this is possible after all. Maybe. Maybe not. Good news travels fast, they say.

Waiting is exponentially more devastating than even the worst possible outcome, sometimes. It's a place where the hopeless and the most hopeful collide, leaving me incapacitated.

And still, there's nothing I can do, but wait.

June 07, 2006 ~ 08:06 | link | random thoughts | share[]


BY ASSOCIATION
LifeHacker linked to an article about motivation and highlighted one particular one. #3 Socialize with others of similar interest. Mutual support is motivating. We will develop the attitudes of our five best friends. If they are losers, we will be a looser. If they are winners, we will be a winner. To be a cowboy we must associate with cowboys. Despite the glaring and very annoying grammatical error, I must say I generally agree with the sentiment.

I've noticed that who you associate with has a lot to do with who you become, what you wish for, what your goals are, and how you spend your days. Being surrounded by your kind of people is crucial. More so than you might imagine. And I mean physically surrounded by. People you go out to lunch with. People you see relatively regularly. When I lived in New York, the people I saw on a day-to-day basis were very different from each other. The people I worked with at TFA would never categorize themselves with the investment bankers or the bookstore people I regularly saw. Despite being so different, every single person I was around was interesting, intellectually stimulating and offered a lot to learn from. I loved that. I soaked up everything around me. Everyone's knowledge. Everyone's excitement. In my environment, it was rare to run into someone who wasn't someone you'd want to know.

That environment made me want to become a more interesting person. It challenged me. It motivated me. And I didn't realize how much until I left it. I didn't understand how much of it I was taking for granted. I do now. I think I did realize it relatively quickly after we moved to San Diego, but I didn't understand the depth of the difference until recently.

The people around you, the place where you work, the friends you have can electrify you. They can make you feel that you can change the world. Move mountains. They can make you feel like you're excellent, deserving, inspiring. They can bring out the very best in you and help you reach all your unrealized potential.

People around you can also bring out the worst in you. They can make you petty, jealous, shallow. Lazy. They can make you scared of yourself and unsure of your abilities.

Next time you pick a new friend, a new job, a new surrounding, remember this: whom you associate with determines the person you become.

May 17, 2006 ~ 21:05 | link | random thoughts | share[]


NATIONAL HONESTY DAY
The complex where I live has a calendar of events that they publish each month. It notes community-wide events like easter egg hunt and gym classes as well as national or religious holidays. In April's calendar, they had "National Honesty Day" under April 30th. I have never heard of this holiday but I am glad it's on the calendar and I wish it would encourage people, even if just for one day.

I am not naive enough to think that people don't lie. Everybody lies and they all have their reasons. When I was little, my mom would lie to her clients and tell them that their merchandise was ready but she couldn't deliver it cause I was so sick, she had to stay home and take care of me. All the while, I would sit next to her, perfectly healthy. I asked her why she lied and she said that these were "little lies" and they didn't matter. Sure they matter. But today's post is not about lying. It's about not telling the truth.

Most of us live our lives sheepishly, not passionate enough to stand for something. My first night of Teach For America training, they showed us a video of the previous year's class and the accomplishments they achieved and all the goals the organization had for the country. I felt so proud to be a part of something so phenomenal that I went back to my room and I called Jake. "I don't know why everyone wouldn't want to be a part of this," I said. "It's amazing." I truly believed it. I still do. I have the utmost respect for organizations like TFA who stand for something and fight like crazy to get it. Most of us, give up way too easily. Most of us learn to be complacent early on in life and stick to saving our opinions to ourselves in most situations. Not lying, per se, but omitting the truth.

Not being honest with your boss' bad taste or incorrect preferences is one thing. The boss might fire you for disagreeing. While I still think it sucks to work for someone like that, I can understand one's choice to be complacent in that situation. But not when it comes to friendship. And not with a significant other. These people are in your life by choice. You picked them. Why not pick people who respect you for your thoughts and be honest with them? A friend of mine thinks truth is overrated, that it isn't necessary to be honest at all times and that sparing someone's feelings is more valuable. I respectfully disagree.

I choose the people in my life because I trust them to be good thinkers. I trust that when they tell me their opinion on things, these opinions are not judgments. They aren't superficial, they aren't spiteful. They are well-thought-out opinions of people whom I trust and respect. I want them to tell me what they think and trust that I can handle the truth. I am independent enough to weigh their opinions without letting them cloud mine. I want them to trust that when I said I want to know what they think, I meant it. Their honest thoughts help me grow and expand my own thoughts. They help me see things from different perspectives.

Of course there are nice and not-so-nice ways to say things. There's bashing and there's constructive feedback. I always expect the people I care about to take the time to put their words in a non-hurtful form. Adjectives without explanations are useless. If my friends are some of the most intelligent and most caring people I know, why wouldn't I want to know their true thoughts?

That's one of the reasons I loved college. In college, people tend to be passionate. They tell you what they think. For hours. Tedious as it might become, the conversation is deep, meaningful, and often honest. Then we grow up, life gets in the way, we never take the time to be honest. We never really listen and really answer. We make decisions on behalf of the other person. (Oh she wouldn't want to hear this. Poor so-and-so, how could I tell her what I really think) We talk about the people we love to other people but never to their face. We wouldn't want to hurt them. Well, you may not be hurting them, but you're also not helping them. You're depriving them of the true friend or partner they thought they had.

And what if you do tell the truth (nicely, gently, constructively) and they get hurt irrevocably? Well, in my opinion, those friends were lost long ago. A relationship based on eggshells and half-truths is not a relationship worth the energy or the time. Especially with a significant other. This person may be there for the rest of your life, do you really want to live with someone to whom you cannot tell your true thoughts/feelings, for the rest of your life?

I don't know where between college and life people give up on honesty but I wish it hadn't become the accepted social norm. I really think we could all benefit from more of it. Even if only on April 30th.

April 10, 2006 ~ 20:04 | link | random thoughts | share[]


ENJOYING GLADWELL
I am not a particularly big sports fan. Actually, I can go so far as to say I am not a sports fan in any way. I get incredibly frustrated watching football because I have a really hard time following the actual ball since it's so small compared to the players and the field. Last time I watched basketball I must have been fourteen. I have never ever watched hockey as far as I can remember. Golf is boring to me in concept let alone on TV. The only game I might be into is baseball and only in very rare cases. So it might make little sense that Jake emailed me this article by an ESPN writer.

Until you realize that he's "talking" with Malcolm Gladwell. Probably my favorite non-fiction writer of all time. I find Gladwell's writing to be consistently thought-provoking. His topics are always interesting to me. His writing is plain, unpretentious and flows beautifully. An amazingly rare accomplishment for a non-fiction writer in my albeit narrow experience. Despite the fact that most of the sports talk completely went over my head, I found some real gems in this article. Here are a few I wanted to share.

As for your (very kind) question about my writing, I'm not sure I can answer that either, except to say that I really love writing, in a totally uncomplicated way. When I was in high school, I ran track and in the beginning I thought of training as a kind of necessary evil on the way to racing. But then, the more I ran, the more I realized that what I loved was running, and it didn't much matter to me whether it came in the training form or the racing form. I feel the same way about writing. I'm happy writing anywhere and under any circumstances and in fact I'm now to the point where I'm suspicious of people who don't love what they do in the same way. I was watching golf, before Christmas, and the announcer said of Phil Mickelson that the tournament was the first time he'd picked up a golf club in five weeks. Assuming that's true, isn't that profoundly weird? How can you be one of the top two or three golfers of your generation and go five weeks without doing the thing you love? Did Mickelson also not have sex with his wife for five weeks? Did he give up chocolate for five weeks? Is this some weird golfer's version of Lent that I'm unaware of? They say that Wayne Gretzky, as a 2-year-old, would cry when the Saturday night hockey game on TV was over, because it seemed to him at that age unbearably sad that something he loved so much had to come to end, and I've always thought that was the simplest explanation for why Gretzky was Gretzky. And surely it's the explanation as well for why Mickelson will never be Tiger Woods.

and a few lines down, Simmons replies with:

On Mickelson and Sports Lent, I remember watching one of those 20/20-Dateline-type pieces about him once, and he was adamant about remaining a family man, taking breaks from golf and never letting the sport consume him ... and I remember thinking to myself, "Right now Tiger is watching this and thinking, 'I got him. Cross Phil off the list. This guy will never pass me.'" The great ones aren't just great, they enjoy what they're doing --

I find this to be completely true. If you love what you do and do it constantly, you are bound to master it eventually. And if you truly love it, can you stop doing it, even for a moment? Many writers carry little notebooks with them and take notes constantly. Photographers never leave the house without at least one camera. Musicians practice night and day. People are often surprised at the overnight success of a now famous person, but in most cases there is a multi-year effort behind the success. I can completely understand taking a break from something to recharge and relax. However, if you want to be really really fantastic at something, I think the trick is to love it obsessively. Then, it consumes you.

That's sort of why I constantly have the breadth vs depth argument with myself. If you want to do everything and are unwilling to choose one over the others, it's impossible for all your interests to consume you. You have a limited amount of time and energy and you have to make choices. Thus, it shall be that I am never going to get the opportunity to master anything until I give up on some things.

This is actually a question I'm obsessed with: Why don't people work hard when it's in their best interest to do so? Why does Eddy Curry come to camp every year overweight?

The (short) answer is that it's really risky to work hard, because then if you fail you can no longer say that you failed because you didn't work hard. It's a form of self-protection. I swear that's why Mickelson has that almost absurdly calm demeanor. If he loses, he can always say: Well, I could have practiced more, and maybe next year I will and I'll win then. When Tiger loses, what does he tell himself? He worked as hard as he possibly could. He prepared like no one else in the game and he still lost. That has to be devastating, and dealing with that kind of conclusion takes a very special and rare kind of resilience. Most of the psychological research on this is focused on why some kids don't study for tests -- which is a much more serious version of the same problem. If you get drunk the night before an exam instead of studying and you fail, then the problem is that you got drunk. If you do study and you fail, the problem is that you're stupid -- and stupid, for a student, is a death sentence. The point is that it is far more psychologically dangerous and difficult to prepare for a task than not to prepare. People think that Tiger is tougher than Mickelson because he works harder. Wrong: Tiger is tougher than Mickelson and because of that he works harder.

This is something I've often discussed with Jake since he hates taking exams so much and makes sure not to study for them. I am never sure if he's genuinely having problems studying of he's just not trying hard enough because he's scared that if he gives it all he has and still fails, he'll have to admit he couldn't achieve despite trying as hard as possible.

I work very hard not to regret my past. I tend to get hung up on the past as is so I try regularly to make sure my decisions are as sound as they can be at the time I make them. I also give the things I do all I have. I want to be able to look back and say that there was nothing more I could have done. I used every single ounce of ability, power, and strength in my body and soul to make something happen. If, then, it still doesn't happen, it's time to move on and realize it wasn't meant to be.

That's not to say that I have followed my own advice all the time. A few years ago, I applied to Stanford Business School. My intention was to do a joint Education and Business degree and to get accepted, you had to apply to the business school first. I have always hated business school but I know Stanford is the bast and I loved the idea of this particular program. I applied to it at the same time I applied to Teach For America. I knew that if I got into both I would choose TFA. Most people might think that's stupid but TFA was what I wanted to do at the time. I figured if I couldn't get in and could get in to Stanford, I'd study Education Policy and hope to start some kind of education non-profit after I graduated. I knew TFA would get me first-hand experience and that's more useful than any education in most cases. (and in the end it turned out to be invaluable).

I had taken my GMATs four and a half years before I applied and since they are good for five years, I just used those scores. I asked for recommendations from my boss and a co-worker. I really did work hard on the essays. Overall, it's not fair to say that I didn't try but I am sure I could have tried harder to perfect my application. I am not sure if it was on purpose or sheer neglect. I knew the acceptance rate was very low and chances were that I wouldn't get in. And when I didn't get in, I kept telling myself I didn't want to get in anyway. I hadn't even bothered to retake my GMATs. It was obvious that Stanford wasn't my first choice. Which is all bullshit. I didn't get in and that's that. If I didn't try to make my application as strong as it could have been, that's sheer stupidity on my part. Why waste time writing essays, bothering to fill out an application, and taking other people's time to write recommendations if I wasn't dying to get in? I was completely retarded to not give it my best effort. And if this was my best effort, I should admit that I wasn't good enough to get in. To not try my hardest just to have some excuse to use when I don't succeed is really setting myself up for failure. Life's too short to live like that.

There's a famous experiment done by a wonderful psychologist at Columbia University named Dan Goldstein. He goes to a class of American college students and asks them which city they think is bigger -- San Antonio or San Diego. The students are divided. Then he goes to an equivalent class of German college students and asks the same question. This time the class votes overwhelmingly for San Diego. The right answer? San Diego. So the Germans are smarter, at least on this question, than the American kids. But that's not because they know more about American geography. It's because they know less. They've never heard of San Antonio. But they've heard of San Diego and using only that rule of thumb, they figure San Diego must be bigger. The American students know way more. They know all about San Antonio. They know it's in Texas and that Texas is booming. They know it has a pro basketball team, so it must be a pretty big market. Some of them may have been in San Antonio and taken forever to drive from one side of town to another -- and that, and a thousand other stray facts about Texas and San Antonio, have the effect of muddling their judgment and preventing them from getting the right answer.

This comment reminded me of The Wisdom of Crowds. Sometimes it's hard be objective when you know the subject too well. It's hard to not make assumptions and to not overcomplicate the situation. I guess the trick is to know when you're in that kind of situation and to seek the help of people who are less involved for those particular situation.

All interesting points, all gathered from a sports article that I wouldn't have even seen had Jake not sent it to me. Shows you that an interesting person like Gladwell is worth reading regardless of the context.

March 19, 2006 ~ 11:03 | link | random thoughts | share[]


OTHER PEOPLE'S EYES
My first job out of college was at a major investment bank in New York City. I worked at this place for several years. I spent three months in London and six months in Tokyo. I had over six different managers in that time. When I decided to move departments a few years into my job, I had decided that choosing the right manager was important to my happiness at work. What I realized a few months later was that my manager wasn't just important, he was crucial to the success of my career.

The manager I worked for in London was wonderful. He liked me and thought highly of me and encouraged me constantly. He had me work with intelligent people and I learned a lot working for him. He's the sole reason I was willing to live apart from Jake for six months to take a position in Tokyo. The manager I worked with before him in New York was totally the opposite and always yelled at me, never made positive remarks about my work and constantly complained. The situation got so bad that I was dreading going to work each and every day. I figured the manager in London (and then Tokyo) was as good as it got.

Until I moved to another department at the bank. When I moved back from Tokyo, I was ready to be done with the company but at my manager's request, decided to look around internally before I quit. I met with several departments, all of whom were only willing to hire me for menial jobs since I had decided to work three days a week. One department, however, seemed to have an interesting project and they really wanted me on board. The head of the department, let's call him Carl, met with me and asked me when I'd be willing to start. The original offer was to support and fix a specific piece of software that was honestly built wrong and broken all over the place. After a few weeks and many meetings, I was suddenly put in charge of rewriting the software altogether. I spent the following two years or so, managing a team of six in London, Tokyo and New York and working only three days a week. What's amazing about this isn't that I was a phenomenal worker. I hadn't really changed all that much from the previous year and my skills hadn't improved that drastically.

But my manager had. Carl believed in me and he told me so daily. Even though he was a Managing Director, he met with me several times a week and congratulated me regularly. He brought me along to meetings with partners and other important people. He asked my opinion in public and in private. He made sure I got all the credit for all my work. He gave me all the resources I asked for and was there to answer all my questions. He truly supported me in every way. More significantly, he believed in me. Everyone thought working three days a week would be a career suicide but he put me in charge of a project and he promoted me to Vice President.

Carl made me believe in myself. He made me feel like I was capable of doing all that he was asking me to do. And, amazingly, I became capable. I rose to his expectations. I became the person he saw me as.

A few years ago a friend told me to be careful about statements I made out loud. She said that if I constantly complain about being fat, people start thinking I am fat even if they didn't previously think so. I believe in the power of saying something to make it happen. Carl believed in me, he supported it and I rose to his expectations. If I say something out loud often enough, other people believe it and start treating me as such and then I become that thing. Obviously, this happens all the time in abuse cases. Someone tells you you're trash often enough, you start believing it. Soon you forget what your personal thoughts were and you just see yourself through other people's eyes. That can cause a lot of damage depending on the people around you.

It can also help you become a better person. It can help you have faith in yourself. It can help you become the person you have the potential to be. The person you already are.

It's all about whose eyes you get see yourself through.

March 17, 2006 ~ 20:03 | link | random thoughts | share[]


THEY DON'T OWE YOU SHIT
I am sick and tired of reading/hearing how parents feel like their kids owe them things. I understand that different people have differing points of view and all are valid. Well, this is my space so here goes nothing. Kids don't ask to be created. Having a baby is something people decide to do (or accidentally fall into in some cases but we're going to ignore those cases for today's point) and people try to set up their lives as much as possible to accommodate this new being.

Having a baby is hard work, bringing it up is even harder. I am only at the very beginning of it and I can already admit it's very very hard at times. And he hasn't even come close to being a teenager yet. By no means, do I feel the need to belittle the amount of work, emotion, money, and sacrifice that goes into raising a human being. However, I feel like parents lose sight of the fact that this was completely their own decision. You had this baby because you wanted to. You fed and clothed and educated him/her because it was your obligation as a parent since this being that you decided to bring into this world would be helpless without you. Since you chose to create this person, I believe it's your responsibility and duty to see it all the way through. Then, if the now grownup decides to "pay you back" by taking care of you and wanting to be with you, that's great. But I don't feel like that's the kid's duty. I feel like it's my duty as a parent to raise my child such that he can learn to take care of himself and be the kind of parent that he'll want to be around.

I remember reading Khalil Gibran's words many years ago:

And a woman who held a babe against her bosom said, "Speak to us of Children." And he said:
Your children are not your children.
They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself.
They come through you but not from you,
And though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.
You may give them your love but not your thoughts.
For they have their own thoughts.
You may house their bodies but not their souls,
For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams.
You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you.
For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday.
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.
Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness
For even as he loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.

I know many parents wish the best for their kids and tell themselves that all the things they don't allow them to do or tell them to do are for the kid's best interest. But the desire to control one's children seems too enticing. It seems so overwhelming that everyone does it. Even when the kid has kids of his/her own. The parents still have expectations and still try not to let go.

January 22, 2006 ~ 18:01 | link | random thoughts | share[]


CHRISTMAS BITTERNESS


My friend Cagla sent me a Christmas card today. I was joking with Jake that I am holding a Christmas card from a Muslim to a Jew. I added that if I weren't living in America, I would have never even noticed that.

In my experience Christmas is considered a lovely holiday in Turkey. Back when I was dating my former boyfriend and he came home with me during Christmas, my friends couldn't understand why he wouldn't want to go to church to light candles.

Despite the fact that a very tiny percentage of people in Turkey actually celebrate the birth of Christ, we all have Christmas trees. Or New Year's trees as we call them. We have Santa Claus. We buy, wrap and exchange presents. Instead of Christmas Day, we do it on New Year's Day. And either my family was not religious enough, or we were cheated out of the Chanukah tradition of exchanging gifts for multiple nights. For us that was only candles. Nothing more than that.

I am often amazed when I see how bitter non-Christians are about Christmas. I am also amazed that people choose to do stupid things like get mad at a store that uses Happy Holidays over Merry Christmas. If you're really so religious then you should remember that this season is not about shopping at all! You should also remember that Jesus wouldn't have been so spiteful and petty. If you're not so religious and actually do more than just celebrate His birth, then why the fuck do you care what people call it? Just be merry and happy. 'Tis the season to give, not to bicker.

Now back to the non-Christians. I must not be religious enough because the idea of celebrating Christmas doesn't bother me one bit. Maybe a ton of years ago, it was about Christianity and Christ but now it's all about Hallmark, shopping, and carols. Christmas is one big Hallmark card. It's time for family to get together and laugh, bicker and watch as the kids go crazy over the presents they got. Nothing more. If I were a truly religious Christian, I'd be very disappointed at the current state of Christmas and what it now has come to symbolize.

So if you're a Jew or Muslim, why not do it the Turkish way? Get a New Year's tree, fill it with presents that you open on Christmas day. And remember, you get all those amazing Bar-Mitzva gifts that the Christians never do!

All joking aside, I don't want David to grow up bitter and I want to stick to my roots a bit. So we will have a bit of everything. We will have New Year's trees. We will open one present Christmas eve, two presents Christmas day, and the rest on New Year's Day. We will also light the candles on the Menorah. I'm sure he'll find a reason to be bitter with that too. But at least this way it's all inclusive.

December 24, 2005 ~ 19:12 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MAKING VALUE JUDGEMENTS


Since the baby still hasn't decided to grace us with his/her presence, I decided to take a long walk yesterday. Walking is supposed to help the baby decide to come and it was a lot more appealing to me than castor oil, which is also supposed to help the baby along.

During my walk, I started thinking about how much time we spend judging people. From the smallest things to the most significant. We spend hours criticizing other people's lives, their clothes, the choices they made for a career or a partner. We criticize their taste in books or music. Their hair color or the way they arranged the furniture. It's almost as if we get off knowing other people's lives aren't as 'good' or 'appropriate' as ours.

I'm not talking about major tragedy here. There are some people who seem to really enjoy that, too. But for the most part, any decent human tends to feel sorry for an individual who is genuinely suffering. I'm talking about people who look down upon others for listening to Britney Spears. Or for reading Sidney Sheldon. Or for wearing certain clothes or shoes. As I was walking around yesterday, I began to wonder what motivates people to judge others that way.

Who decides that one singer is "better" than another? Who decides that being good at math shows a higher level of intelligence than being artistic? Why and where were such conclusions made? Does it make a person feel better to know that their musical taste is "superior" to others'? I truly don't understand why we do this? When did it start feeling good to bash others? It makes me sad that children who are born not knowing any of this will eventually learn and have to adapt to the society in which they are raised.

This is why I ended up leaving my home country and environment. Not only did I not fit in, but I couldn't foresee a situation in which I ever would. Isn't it sad that because everyone has to be the same, we miss the opportunity of learning from each other? The chance to expand our horizons? If I only hung out with other computer programmers, I would have never learned the joy of sign language or graphic design. I may not be nearly as talented in either as some others are but I still get to appreciate them thanks to the people who love them and have opened my eyes.

Even if I didn't care to learn certain things, why can't I let people do what they like to do without making value judgements. Why is it funny to make fun of people's choices? As someone who's been judged a lot in her life, I have decided to be extra careful in making judgements of others. I am going to make a huge effort to watch my value judgements and to stop them. I will listen to myself more and destroy all my stupid preconceived ideas until I instinctively give people the benefit of the doubt and the respect they deserve.

I owe that to the little girl I used to be.

February 03, 2005 ~ 09:02 | link | random thoughts | share[]


ODDS AND ENDS


Since last week lacked in updates but not in events, I figured I'd post some of what's been going on:

The Big Apple: Thanks to the successful rollout, I get two days off so Jake and I decided to use this time to take a long weekend in New York. We haven't been back there since we moved out last April so I can't tell you how excited I am to be going back to the city I love and to see the friend I miss so dearly. I will also make sure to take a ton of pictures and eat bagels while I am there.

This is talent: Dan Schwartz's photographs in the last issue of 28mm are some of the most creative I've ever seen. I keep going back every day to look at them again and again. There's something about those colors that pulls me in each time.

Driving: I've finally managed to drive to work all by myself Monday morning for the first time. For those of you who've been following my ineptitude with cars, you know this is a huge achievement for me. I am hoping it's a sign that I might eventually be able to drive though I might have to move back to the loving arms of New York just to never drive again.

Turkish Food: Thanks to an article in the San Diego Reader, we found a small cafe in Mission Beach that serves a few Turkish dishes. If you're into Turkish food, check out Olives. It's on 805 Santa Clara Place, Mission Beach. If you know of any Turkish restaurants in the San Diego area, please please let me know.

March 23, 2004 ~ 14:03 | link | random thoughts | share[]


WORDS ON PAPER


This summer, Jake and I listened to all of David Sedaris' books on tape. I had already read all the books so my experience with the audio was quite different from Jake's. He was hearing the very talented Sedaris for the first time and laughed the entire time. What took me by surprise was how different the stories seemed from when I had read them. Was I remembering them incorrectly or was he even funnier than I thought?

The difference, we decided, came from my reading his stories versus his reading his stories. When he read the stories he had written aloud, he knew exactly where the emphasis fell and exactly where to stop for a stronger effect. When I read them, sometimes I was right on and sometimes I was way off. In cases where I was off, the entire story got affected by my inability to accentuate correctly.

In today's email-centric society, I think this inability to put proper emphasis can lead to serious consequences. Just like sarcasm might be interpreted differently, words on paper have a million possible permutations when you put them in different emotional and psychological context. I have been guilty of reading an email from a friend and getting offended. Depending on my mood, the same email might be rude, dismissing, noncommittal, or encouraging. Just like someone could utter the same words but they change meaning if the person is crying or laughing. I think this is the main reason I put a lot of smileys in my written communication. When I chat or write email, I notice that every other line has a smiley or a sad face to emphasize my connotations.

I imagine someone with an English degree would claim that I am not taking the time to choose the correct word. And that if I were picky about my words, I could drastically reduce the potential for misunderstanding. I'm sure that's true but I think email by its nature tends to be for quick communication and thus doesn't often contain well thought-out words. We write and then hit send. We don't think too too much about it.

So what's the answer? Should we be thinking more when we write? Should we give the other person the benefit of the doubt when we read? Should we just hope our intentions will be clear?

I guess I like to assume the best of people and thus I'd suggest not reading into things too much. But, then again, maybe that's too naive.

February 24, 2004 ~ 21:02 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MEMORY LANE
I save all my email.

I'm not exactly sure why but I have emails going back to my Freshman year in college, my first email account ever. The first email I can find is dated September 16, 1992. Every now and then, I decide to go back and read some of the thousands of messages I've exchanged during four years of college. Today was one of those days.

Each time I read them, I'm amazed at how many friends I've completely lost touch with over the years. Some, I fell out of touch with before graduation, others soon after. A few of the emails are from people I can't even remember. Some of the people I remember, I have no idea why the emails stop so abruptly. Did something happen? Did one of us piss the other off somehow? I imagine I'd remember if someone had hurt my feelings and caused me to discontinue our conversation so I am assuming that one of us got lazy and didn't keep up with the correspondence and the other didn't follow up. The emails and then the friendship just tapered off.

The funny thing is, many of those emails bring me fond memories today and I am always tempted to track down and contact those individuals. This, of course, opens a can of worms: Would they remember me? Would they respond back or think I am a weirdo for contacting them after ten years? Would they get freaked out by the fact that I tracked them down?

If I think about it for long enough, I figure I have nothing to lose (besides the precious time it will take to track them down). If people are weirded out by my contacting them, they simply won't write back and that's that. If, on the other hand, one of them does remember me and wants to get back in touch, I get the chance to reunite with an old friend. Doesn't sound like too much of a risk to take.

I go through this thought-process each time I read my archive of mails. I am always amazed at how many people were an important part of my life at one time and today I can't even tell you where they live. How many people's emails still make me smile today. How many memories are fresh on my mind. How much fun college really was. And, of course, how much I've changed since I came to the United States. These people are a tie to my past; they had a part in my becoming who I am. No wonder a part of me craves to find them again.



October 02, 2003 ~ 00:10 | link | random thoughts | share[]


JUDGMENTAL BANTER

Here's something I've learned from having spent ten years in a foreign country: it's easy to judge others.

One would think I could have had this lesson in my home country. Or that it should have nothing to do with countries at all. And one would be right. Being judgmental seems to be human nature. It's our way of vocalizing something that we don't approve. It's our way of criticizing and speaking up. All of which is within one's right, or it should be. Each person is entitled to his or her own opinion on all matters. The fact that it's your opinion means it's yours and no one can tell you otherwise.

So I've been working hard at reminding myself that when people criticize my choices, my actions, my thoughts, my feelings and my country, they have a right to feel or think the way they do. What bothers me, however, is the quickness with which people judge. Most people I know never bother to learn all sides of a matter and never care to listen to an opposing view.

If a person wants to upgrade a thought from opinion to declaration or even something that they believe is worth discussing, I think it's crucial for that person to have completed the appropriate research. I could come to you and say, "I think three-year-old boys are stupider than three-year-old girls." And if you have any interest in discussing this subject matter with me (which might be debatable after you hear the biased and ignorant way in which I worded my claim) you'd ask me what my sources are. Where is my data? How exactly do I define "stupid"? What is the pool of three-year-olds I have researched? Was this a controlled experiment? For my statement to be anything more than something I pulled out of thin air, I must have some examples and data to back it up.

The same goes for history. It's easy for someone to have opinions on who did wrong when it comes to some of the world's major historical blunders. But even with 20/20 hindsight, it's nearly impossible to prove that one's opinion is more valid than another's. It's easy for you to sit in your chair and say that a country that's oceans away from your living room should do such-and-such to put a stop to the terrible situation over there. Yet, who are we to say exactly what's going on?

I'm always amazed at the way people react when they find out that I'm Turkish. Over the ten years, I've heard just about anything and everything. How this was our fault and that was our fault, etc. Not that I'm disagreeing about anything specific but I really do doubt that most of these people know anything about Turkey besides the few lines they've read in their history books or heard from another opinioned source. At least I'm honest enough to admit that my education and exposure was biased and that I don't know all the facts. I don't know the situation and such I am not really willing to pass judgement.

While I completely agree that taking any human's life is an awful act and we shouldn't be killing people, especially as aimlessly as it appears to be lately, I also understand how complicated the world is and how near impossible it is to place blame. It's never one person's fault. Often times, there are deep-rooted problems that require years and years of work to reach a possible resolution. And maybe I am naive, but I do believe that people don't enjoy killing others. Even the most evil-seeming ones do it out of a corrupt or confused sense of justice, but not for the sake of senseless murder. Not that it makes it excusable. It just allows me to keep my sense of faith in the world, I suppose.

I love America. To me it's the homeland I never had. I feel like it's where I was meant to live all along. And I also love Turkey; it's a crucial part of my identity, one that I have always been proud to vocalize. And when I hear people criticize either nation, I feel protective urges rise within me. I feel like telling people that they are unappreciative and bitter. But then I listen. In case they have something valuable to say. To hear the meat behind their opinions. To see if they've done their research. To find out if it's anything besides judgmental banter.

So that I can learn.

Previously? Shedding.


April 09, 2002 ~ 00:04 | link | random thoughts | share[]


POINT OF VIEW

I've realized that, like many others around me, I'm a victim of 'limited point of view.'

I remember years of torturous childhood experiences and pain just to be able to hang out with the group of people I was initially thrust in. My parents' friends' children. These people, purposefully or not, made me feel worthless on a regular basis. They made fun of my looks, my habits, my opinions, my preferences. Just about everything. They hurt me so much and so to the core that I can recite most of their words even today. I can even tell you exactly where those words were uttered. But I couldn't even perceive the idea of not hanging out with them. I had no other friends. If I stopped trying to fit in this group, I'd be completely alone. It felt as if I had absolutely no other choice.

A few years later, an opportunity presented itself and I was able to find a new group of friends more accepting and rewarding that the previous, which helped me regain some of my long lost sense of self and allowed me to find even more appropriate friends. The hardest part was straying from the initial path.

Looking back, it's easy for me to say that I should have left even sooner, I should have made friends of my own. But the fact is, at the time, my limited point of view did not allow for that possibility. It's hard to seek something that doesn't even cross your mind, or something that's clearly not an option for you.

The same thing happened when I graduated from college. Having wanted to study computers since I was ten, I immediately found a job as a programmer and got on the path to 'success.' In the first few years I had a lot of tough times. Worked many weekends and late late nights, dealt with irresponsible and immature bosses, took a lot of the stress home with me. There were many times I spent hours crying from frustration and loss of hope. Even though my family and loved ones told me to quit, I never considered it to be an option. I didn't really see a way out.

It sounds stupid now, but it truly was a lack of point of view at the time. I was so locked in my path that it seemed unthinkable to waver. It took a long time for me to come to terms with my unhappiness and I had to get really miserable before I started taking initiative. And literally within the week I moved into my new job, I wondered what took me so long. I realized that it was easily possible for me to be happy at a job and that I was insane for having suffered as long as I did in my previous one.

Hindsight is always 20/20.

I am now standing at another crossroads in my life. Another case where I am struggling to look at my life from another point of view. Giving up a lucrative job and one that appears successful and amazing to others. A job that I enjoy. This time it's for a bigger cause. This time I don't know if things will work out. I'm feeling the same anxiety I've felt before. The fear of leaving the comforts of my chosen path. I'm struggling to let it not get to me.

I'm trying to stand on my table and look at it from a different point of view.

Previously? Shortchanged.


January 27, 2002 ~ 00:01 | link | random thoughts | share[]


A FICKLE RELATIONSHIP

Jake and I saw startup.com last week. The movie follows the conception, rise and fall of an internet startup. Govworks is the name of the firm that the documentary follows. At one point in the movie, the main character, the CEO of the company, mentions how their idea is for the good of the people. How the reason they exist is to help people. It's not his exact words, it might not even be the exact logic behind his words, but the words made me wonder about the plausibility of for-profit companies that exist for the good of humanity. All these words just to ask:

Is it possible for a profit company to have the public's interest at heart?

The idea behind serving the public interest is finding an area where there is a need for help. Building houses. Teaching in inner-city schools. Providing service for the deaf. Giving shelter to the needy. Running a soup kitchen. The idea is to try to make the world a better place. The idea is to wake up each morning and be able to look yourself in the mirror. Working for the public interest is an unselfish act.

A for-profit company's ultimate goal is to make money. Regardless of the specific purpose and details of the company, a for-profit is inherently trying to accumulate profit. The profits are not to be donated to the public. In most cases, they are so that the company can do well in an IPO. And then they are so that the company's shares stay high. And then they are so the partners can be wealthy. Making money for oneself is a selfish act. Not selfish in the 'you're such a selfish pig' sense but in the 'you're putting yourself first' sense.

Can the selfish world of for profit companies mesh with the non-selfish cause of doing good for the public? It seems to me that a for-profit firm, when push comes to shove, would have to do what's right for the business. Take the alternative that might bring in more money. Even at the cost of forgoing human interest. Which makes me think that for-profit and human interest cannot go together.

Initially, when I thought about companies working for human interest, I could only think of non-profit agencies or organizations. Then I started thinking of professions. Doctors. Teachers. Government workers. Both doctors and teachers have a wide range. There are doctors that charge an arm and a leg. There are private tutors who do the same. And yet, many doctors and teachers make so little that tons of people choose not to go into the profession for that very reason. The question of whether teachers should get paid a lot is an involved one and deserves another entry for another day.

It's been a few days and at the back of my mind, I'm still pondering whether the coupling of working for human interest and running a for-profit firm is one of lifelong happiness or one bound to result in divorce.

Any ideas?

Previously? Obligations.


January 06, 2002 ~ 00:01 | link | random thoughts | share[]


GROWING UP

There's a discussion at metafilter about growing up, prompted by this.

In the last five years or so, I've spent a lot of time wondering what qualifies someone as a grownup, or more personally, when I would qualify as one. Looking at the comments at metafilter, there seem to be a few common themes: a parent's death, having a full-time job, buying a house, getting a divorce. It appears the definition of grown-up changes from person to person. Some people associate it with earning a living on one's own while others relate it to coping with an emotional event.

Each time I cross a major milestone in my life, I wonder if I'm mature enough to be there. Moving to another continent, earning a high salary, paying a hefty rent, getting married. Each of them, an event associated with being a grownup. Am I really mature enough to get married? Am I mature enough to be a teacher?

I spent most of my childhood being too old for my age. A teenager who didn't drink, smoke, or do drugs is pretty boring. I picked books over dress-up. I had goals. I had to work hard to achieve them. At seventeen, I left my home and my family to go miles and miles away. I figured I was old enough.

Not really.

Over the years, I learned that being mature is not a line one crosses. It's not like there's a day before which you're a child and after which you're a grownup. There are events that occur in our lives that force us to act mature and take responsibility, often sooner than we wished. And then there are events for which the time feels right so we take the leap, like marriage and children. I don't believe anyone's ready to have children. It just feels right and we feel like we're in a healthy, stable situation and that we can provide for a child.

And then there are the situations that cause every person to act below their age. A few too many glasses of wine. Hanging out with a kid. Watching a football game. Playing video games. Besides these common cases, each person has a unique series of situations that will reduce that person to a child.

I've come to terms with the fact that getting older will always feel weird to me. Getting married like my parents and working as a teacher both sound odd when uttered to someone else but feel comfortable and right when I don't think much about it. I don't think it matters much when one officially stops being an adolescent. Putting a number on it guarantees that there will be people within the range who feel unfairly treated like a child, and a set of people who fall outside the range but yet act like adolescents.

Life is not about keeping track or fitting in a category. It's about learning to deal with things as they come and taking responsibility. It's also about maximizing the level of fun, no matter how childish, as long as it's not at the expense of others.

The rest simply doesn't matter.

Previously? Looking Forward.


January 03, 2002 ~ 00:01 | link | random thoughts | share[]


PERSONALITY CHANGE

Can you change who you are?

At first thought, my instinct is to say, "yes." One part will, two parts determination and mix thoroughly.

Over nine years ago, I moved to the United States. I remember the day I got accepted to Carnegie Mellon University as if it happened this morning. The telegram, the flowers and the tears. I'd wanted to come to America since my early teens and getting into CMU had been a long and strenuous journey.

I remember thinking that this was my one chance to change. To start over. No one knew me in the US, no one had grown up with the geeky Karen who wore glasses as thick as a coke-bottle bottom. No one knew my weaknesses, no one could use my past to make fun of me. It was the perfect opportunity to have a personal makeover. I was determined to change myself.

Week one came and I was cool. I made some new friends, I laughed at the right times, I wore the right things and I didn't say anything too embarrassing. I don't mean to imply that I was at the center of the in-crowd or anything, but I did manage not to screw up anything major. So it was possible to change oneself, after all.

Not exactly.

It took a few weeks or so, but eventually I made my way back to the original Karen. The one with the same set of flaws, the collection of not-so-cute quirks and the same baggage. The new Karen was just a role, and one can only act for so long. The new skin we create becomes uncomfortable. It's too tight or too loose. It just doesn't feel right.

Over the years, I've had a few opportunities to start over. The move to Pittsburgh, a new boyfriend, and then another, a move to New York City and a new job. Each presented me with the same titillating need to create a new Karen and every single time, I crawled right back into the familiar one.

So is it impossible to change oneself?

I think that when we make a conscious effort, it's extremely difficult to change who we are. And yet, I also think that we change continuously. Each day of our lives small things happen. These tiny, insignificant bits change us in miniscule ways. Sometimes huge things occur and our personality takes leaps. But often times, these are not premeditated. So much so that even we might not notice that we changed until the right opportunity presents itself. Not only is it possible to change oneself, but we are continuously in the process of changing ourselves.

The trick is not to force it. To let nature take its own course. To recognize that the very first step to changing oneself is accepting oneself.

Previously? 'Tis the Season .


December 26, 2001 ~ 00:12 | link | random thoughts | share[]


DON'T PASS GO

Life offers us different opportunities at different times.

I mean we have a series of opportunities that are in front of us everyday but, once in a while, something major comes up. An opportunity that someone else or some other situation made available for you. Something completely unexpected. Something that, if it worked for you, would make you leap and not just take another step towards your goal. Every now and then, such an opportunity emerges and if you don't take notice, it slips right by you.

And here's what I think: You should never let an opportunity like that slip by.

And I don't mean you should seize it either. Sometimes, even if the opportunity comes your way, it might not be the best thing for you. Let's say you're offered a trip to the destination of your dreams. Since this is my site, we'll say that place is Antarctica. Someone comes up to me tomorrow and tells me that I can go to Antarctica in January. All expenses paid, a month-long trip where I get to pet penguins. After jumping up and down for several hours, I think it would be a good idea for me to have a serious think about it.

Every opportunity comes at a cost. This Antarctica offer would mean that I need to quit my job or at least take an unpaid leave. It could mean I would have to leave Jake for a month. And there may be many other downsides to this otherwise amazing-seeming offer. So I'm not saying that jumping on it is the best move.

What I am saying is that it's crucial to consider it. A major opportunity like that doesn't come often and if you let one pass you by, there's no guarantee it will come your way again. At least not soon. So instead of saying how what a bummer it is that I got the chance to go to Antarctica but couldn't do it, if I sat down and had a serious think about it, I might not regret it.

If I considered all sides of the matter, then regardless of the decision I make, I know that I didn't let the opportunity go unnoticed. I know that no matter how the outcome turns out, at the time, I thought I was making the right decision. In the end, even if I made the wrong decision, I still think that's better than not making one.

I guess it's all about control. When you let things pass you by, you're giving up the chance to control your destiny.( isn't that an oxymoron, 'controlling your destiny.') It's true that if things don't work out, you can say "I didn't choose to do this, the decision was made for me." but is that how you want to live your life? Isn't there a point after which we need to get on the driver's seat and say "This is my life and it's short and I am here to make it the most it can be."

We all get one life to live, at least one that we remember at any point in time, and don't you want to be holding the reins to your life?

Previously? Tracking Happiness.


December 04, 2001 ~ 00:12 | link | random thoughts | share[]


TWO HOURS

A friend of my mother's sent me a presentation on using one's time wisely. The presentation was okay and had some interesting points, and some obvious ones. About twenty slides into the show, a question caught my attention.

If you had two extra hours every day, what would you do with them?

My first instinct was, "I'd write my novel." I've been trying to write this novel for the last year and it's definitely not progressing as quickly as I would like it to. Having left the other one incomplete, I'm scared this book will face the same fate and I really don't want it to.

But then I realized that I put off writing my novel cause it's so hard. It requires a lot of my energy to get it all on paper and I tend to put it off until the last minute, so if I had an extra two hours everyday, I doubt I'd actually spend them on my novel.

My next answer was "I'd read." Another bottomless pit. No matter how much I read, there are always more books to read and I continuously wish for more time. I have a minimum of eight books checked out from the library at any one time and I simply cannot go through them fast enough. Reading was definitely a valid choice for me.

The more I thought about the question, the more I wondered the answers. I wondered what I did with the twenty-four hours I get each day. Don't get me wrong, I maximize my time a lot. In a week, I manage to volunteer in two places, work in an investment bank, take six classes, read two books, write my novel and at least another essay or short story, see a movie, watch twenty hours of TV, write my site at least five times, and sleep a minimum of eight hours. I am not worried that I'm not getting enough done, I'm just curious how many hours of my day each task takes. And if I had two more hours, what would be the best task for me to do?

Hang out with friends more, I think. Most of my friends are just as busy as I am and we rarely seem to see each other as often as we say we want to. If we all had two extra hours, maybe it'd be easier to find the time to meet.

I guess I'm better at making a list of things I wouldn't do with the extra hours. I wouldn't work or sleep. I wouldn't sit on the couch and watch TV. I wouldn't exercise.

The question of what I would do is hard to answer cause I like to do so many things and my list of to-dos never ends. Actually, it never even goes below fifteen items. So another two hours would maybe allow me to keep my list at thirteen items or eleven if I wanted to be optimistic. Which shows me that I am bad at this as I would not appreciate the two added hours as much as I should.

I wonder how many hours would have to be added before I just can't think of anything more to do. Since I adore reading, I venture to say that the answer would be infinite. There aren't enough hours you can add to my day.

I think that says a lot of not so great things about me or my lifestyle, but for now, I am choosing not to concentrate on that too much. Instead, I'm going to go and use the next three hours of my day on a dinner and a movie.

What would you do with an extra two hours each day?

Previously? Normal.


September 21, 2001 ~ 00:09 | link | random thoughts | share[]


HEALTHY COMPETITION

Is "healthy competition" an oxymoron?

A movie I watched today, made me wonder about the negative effects of competition. By definition, a competition has winners and losers. One winner and many losers. That means one person feels great and many people feel lousy.

So what's the point?

How come competition is so encouraged? How come we glorify winning? How come kids are singled out by the teachers and coaches as special? How is this constructive?

I imagine that people who approve of competition may say that the drive to win encourages you to improve yourself. While on the surface that may appear to be the case, the reality of the situation differs greatly. If Joe is a star football player and Moe is the second-best, Moe doesn't really care to be a better player, he just cares to outperform Joe so that he can be the star. It's no longer about the game, it's about Joe. About beating Joe. If Joe were to suddenly transfer to another school, Moe no longer cares to improve his game because he has no one to worry about. I agree that if Joe and Moe are in the same school, Moe might improve his game, but I think we undermine the importance of the underlying motive.

I truly believe in the saying "No man is an island." We don't live alone and the world is not a race. It's a society, a community and it needs harmony, not competition.

Imagine you're an amazing baseball player. One of a kind. In a team, you're most definitely the star. Now imagine, no team member will play with you. Maybe you're really cocky, or just an ass, or maybe you show off too much. Whatever the reason may be, others will not play with you. Suddenly, your talent is not so useful. Since baseball is a team game, and no one will play with you, you're unable to play. So obviously, the world is not your mountain.

Yet the schools encourage competition even at an early age. Spelling bees, assembly awards. So do sports. What's the purpose of competitive sports at a young age? At an age where the kids cannot understand the difference between "just getting the other guy out of the picture" and "being the best I can be." What's the value in making a seven year old feel like a loser? Singling a kid out. Causing the children to view their classmates as people they have to beat to get ahead.

Yet the world often operates because everyone plays his part. We learn to work with others to deliver big projects, ones we couldn't have completed on our own. We team up with other people who have similar interests or beliefs to start organizations. Almost every major change in the world is the result of a team, not one person.

So why not encourage teamwork instead?

Previously? Blank Slate.


September 08, 2001 ~ 00:09 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MISTAKES

I believe in making mistakes.

I know that in the overall scheme of life mistakes are meant to be bad. They lead us to failure and who wants to fail?

But that's not entirely true, similar to yesterday's point, the importance of learning firsthand also applies to making mistakes.

Let's say you didn't want to learn firsthand, how could you avoid making mistakes? Well, by listening to other people of course! With that approach, you're making two fundamental assumptions:

One. What they consider to be a mistake in their environment and circumstances is also going to be a mistake in yours.

Two. Repeating the actions that led them to their mistake will result in your facing the same mistake.

I believe that both of these have cases where they become incorrect assumptions.

Let's take the first case. Decisions and choices are extremely environment-based. Divorcing an abusive partner may be considered a huge mistake in some societies and the correct path in others. Same goes for abortion and many other controversial issues. Dropping out of school to help save your family's financial situation might seem shortsighted to some people but might lead you to go through doors that would not have been available to you in some societies because in yours family values are extremely highly regarded. What I consider to be a stupid move might be an act of genius for you.

On a related note, just because you do the same thing I did doesn't mean you will reach the same results I did. We could both cut school and go to the movies and while I get caught and end up getting detention, you might end up meeting someone who changes your life in that movie theater. (okay, it's not likely but it could happen) A lot of our life depends on people or events outside our control. The likeliness of a certain set of actions resulting in the same exact outcome is very low.

Even if we ignored the above points. I still think there's much to be said for making your own mistakes and learning from them. When you make a mistake, depending on the significance of that mistake, it stays in your mind for quite a long period of time. You don't need someone to explain to you why it's a bad idea, you lived through it and you learned. Even when the same actions result in a mistake, there might be different reasons why it was a mistake for you than why it was a mistake for the other person. And it's important to know the difference.

When we make mistakes, we learn about ourselves more than anything else. Yes, we learn about our environment, too, but we learn so much more about our logic. Our assumptions. Our ignorance. Our unrealistic expectations. Our naive outlook. We try to sit and pinpoint where exactly things went wrong. At what point did the great idea turn into a disaster?

That's not something any other human being can teach you.

Previously? Show Me.


August 18, 2001 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


PERMANENCE

Forever didn't use to be a scary thought to me.

I was the sort of person who made long-term decisions and stuck to them. I decided to come to the United States for college at the age of twelve. I chose computers as my main field at seven. Those goals never changed. I came here; I studied information systems. I got a programming job.

The same pattern applied to my relationships. I hung on regardless of how bad situations got. An abusive boyfriend. A cruel best friend. But I was in it for the long run, I knew how to stick around. I didn't do things on a whim.

I was Ms. Consistent.

Deep down, I always resented myself for not being daring or impromptu enough. I secretly wished to do something crazy, like get a tattoo or pierce my tongue. But I never had the courage.

Today, I was chatting with Daphna about how I don't like tattoo's anymore and it got me thinking. Why had I changed my mind?

And I realized that getting a tattoo wasn't necessarily an out-of-character thing for a person like me. Whether the receiver is aware of it at the time or not, a tattoo is a permanent commitment. It's quite difficult to remove and even then leaves a scar. It's not temporary.

It seems I've decided to put permanence on hold for a while.

Temporary sounds more attractive for now. Not temporary in the sense of "this week" but temporary in the sense of "it's okay if you change your mind ten years down the road." I want to try different things. Do something that I'm passionate about. Shake my beliefs up. Shake my life up. Not worry about doing something that wasn't 'part of the plan.'

I want to fall and get up. Just to see that I can. Just to see that there's nothing to be scared of. I want to conquer surviving within a world of unknown and handle situations as they come my way. I want to stop anticipating potential problems and worrying about them. I want to stop putting myself on a path. I want to climb trees instead and figure out what branch to jump to at the end of each one.

At least just for a little while.

So I don't secretly wish for a piercing anymore. Instead, I'll have temporary tattoos, henna, jewelry and beads.

But no tattoos.

Previously? Body Image.


August 10, 2001 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


PLACING BLAME

I think there's a skewed opinion of body image in the world.

Well, at least in most of the cultures in which I've lived.

Many women try to change their body structure to fit the range of what's 'desirable to a man'. Most of the women I've talked to who are struggling with their weight or self image seem to link it to being wanted. If I'm pretty, men will get attracted to me more, and then I can find someone to like me. It might sound convoluted and desperate to some people, but I've heard this concern multiple times.

Putting the issue of whether you need someone else in your life to feel good about yourself aside, the notion of getting thin to please men doesn't really work, in my opinion.

From what I've experienced, the ones that judge women's bodies are other women. Most men I've met are not really affected by weight as much as women think they are. Some like thinner, some like fuller but none of them notice the extra five pounds you gained last week. At least not the men who are worth having.

Women, however, size you up and down and can tell if the skirt you wore yesterday is a tiny bit tight, if you're bloated from your period, if the shoes you're wearing are scuffed. Women scrutinize other women. It's as if they find you to be a constant threat and therefore need to find fault. Not only do they analyze you to bits, but then they call up your mutual friends and share.

Of course I'm generalizing. Of course it's not true for every woman. Some women are wonderful and kind and caring and don't spend any time feeling good about other women's weaknesses. But, in my experience, women notice other women's body structures and criticize them a lot more than men do.

Most of the women's magazines give tips on losing weight and looking thin. They promote thinness simply by plastering their magazines with thin people. They don't come out and tell you that it's bad to be above a size 4 but they imply, coax and leave subtle hints.

In my opinion, many of today's eating and self-image issues are caused by the women in our lives. The magazines, the movie stars, the family members, siblings, and many others.

So if we want to address these problems, I think we should really start looking within our gender.

Previously? Web People.


August 09, 2001 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


COMPETITION AND CELEBRATION

I've never been a competitive person.

A month after Jake and I started dating, we ended up taking a class together. Many people assumed that the class would put a strain on our relationship. That our differing grades might give birth to feelings of animosity between us.

But it didn't.

On the contrary, Jake and I chose to be in the same group and we encouraged each other and studied together. Even at that point, I cared enough about him that his getting a good grade made me happy and not jealous.

I tend not to define my life and successes by others.

I don't mean that to sound standoffish. It doesn't imply that I think I'm too good to compare myself to others. It just means that knowing that I'm more successful than so-and-so doesn't make me feel accomplished.

I don't want anyone else to be unsuccessful, unhappy or unaccomplished. There's enough room in the world for all of us to be happy and accomplished in our own ways.

I simply want to be the best that I can be.

This is where things get a bit sticky. It seems my personal requirements for becoming happy and successful are overwhelmingly high. Each time I reach one level of success, I set the next one without spending too much time doting on having accomplished the previous goal. I keep pressing and pushing, determined to see how far I can take it. How much before I break down.

Recently, Jake and I were talking about a success in his family. It was a situation that had done a 180 from the previous year. Last time, we'd wallowed on the sorrow and misfortune for quite some time and the spirits were very low. I was telling Jake that it's only fair that, this time "We should celebrate."

I said, "I think life should be all about under-emphasizing failures and over-celebrating successes."

After the words came out of my mouth, I was surprised at how rarely I listen to my own advice. It's crucial to learn from your mistakes but wallowing in them only makes you depressed. And it's important to celebrate the good moments in life. It's necessary to note having reached a goal. Otherwise, all the work I've done to get here doesn't seem so difficult. Yet it is. Each tiny step that gets one closer to happiness or self-satisfaction is a major accomplishment and requires due attention.

I've decided to take some of my own advice. I'll keep setting personal goals. I'll keep aiming higher and higher. But I'll also stop ignoring the importance of small successes. I'm moving from only jumping a series of hurdles to throwing many parties.

And you're invited.

Previously? Judging.


July 17, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


JUDGING

You are so judgmental.

If you mutter the words "Not me," you simply fall into the majority of people who don't admit to doing the very things of which they accuse others.

There are certain fundamental characteristics that are a part of every human being. While I don't believe we're necessarily born judgmental, we certainly develop this discriminatory outlook on life at one point or another.

The same way we discover lying.

I tend to be weary of anyone who claims to never lie. That's such an obvious lie that either the person is blatantly taking me to be a fool, or, worse, they are not willing to admit the truth to their own selves. We all lie. It's human nature. Some of us do it more compulsively. Some of us do it only under the pretense that they're sparing the other person's feelings. Some people have been doing it for so long that they don't even notice it anymore.

But everybody lies.

I have never met an adult who has never lied.

Neither have I met one who doesn't judge.

You think you are open-minded? Think back to the last time you saw someone with seven piercings on her face? How about the girl in pink tight leather pants with high heels and a low-cut blouse? The guy who wears big silver chains around his neck and no t-shirts? The fifty-year-old man who drives a Porsche convertible? The girl in a three-piece suit with a pearl necklace talking on her cell phone? Two men holding hands? A teenager kissing a seventy year old?

No matter how open minded you are, at least one of the above scenarios will make you jump to conclusions about a person. You make judgement calls on how much money she has or whether she works or not. You assume she must be after his money or that he must be not well educated. She must be a bitch and he must be fun to be around.

You might not hate any of the people. Judgmental doesn't necessarily mean that you're bigoted. It just means that you judge people on a certain set of criteria. We all have categories that we like to place people in and we use certain cues when we meet them to figure out in which category they best fit.

The most common cues are visual. If you want to test this out, give the same picture to a few friends and ask them to tell you about the person in the picture. How old is she? What does she to for a living? Would you like this person? Why?

I guarantee you that they will have answers. Most likely different ones (unless you have a really homogenous circle) but none of them will say that they cannot answer until they meet the person.

Our categories are defined by our surroundings. Possibly at the beginning by the values of our family, and then school, friends, work, etc. With each new environment and year, we might define the categories more specifically and we might realize that most people can't be classified easily.

But we do it anyway.

Previously? Fuck.


July 16, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


RANDOM

I didn't use to believe in randomness.

As a person who spends too much time on each of her moves, my decisions and choices are never haphazard. I have specific reasons for almost each step and can recite them to you if you so wished. I try to think before I speak and I search for meaning behind my actions. The idea that people do things without thinking never made sense to me.

I can agree that, often times, people aren't aware of their own motives. Many of us are affected by our subconscious and do things because they 'feel right' or 'come naturally'. To me, even forgetting was an active decision. The fact that you forgot to buy a dress of the occasion meant that you secretly didn't want to go at all. I guess I didn't like the idea of taking away credit. Since humans are amongst rare animals that have thought and decision-making capabilities, it didn't make sense that they wouldn't constantly take advantage of their unique capability.

Accepting randomness sounded like a copout to me. Instead of taking responsibility, people got to say "oh, I forgot" or "it didn't mean anything". Everything means something. Things happen for a reason. If you forgot, it most likely wasn't all that important to you in the first place. Instead of hiding behind excuses, I wished people would be bold enough to tell the truth.

"Actually, I don't enjoy going out on Friday nights."

"I'm afraid I didn't like that movie at all."

"I just feel like you always bring me down."

There are better ways to phrase honest sentiments and it's important to do that, but so is not being fake. And I just figured why lie forever when you can tell the truth once and be done with it?

Everything means something.

I'm not sure if I believe that anymore. The above sentence makes it really hard to deal with major calamities beyond your control like murder, rape or losing a baby. I'm adjusting my mind to the fact that sometimes things happen for no reason at all. At least no discernable reason. And it's okay not to know the 'why's.

Sometimes it's best to just move on. To know that something will only affect you if you let it and that you won't.

Maybe entropy is more likely to be the world's model than order, but it still doesn't excuse your not thinking about your actions and words. Next time you run across a situation where you seem to have done something inadvertently, pay attention to your feelings and thoughts.

Maybe you'll discover that the act wasn't so random after all.

Previously? Seed.


July 09, 2001 ~ 00:07 | link | random thoughts | share[]


FIRST TIME

I've always been fascinated by people who claim to be the first to do something.

"Oh he is always the first to discover a new book or a trend." And for some reason people think that this is a sought-after trait.

I just fail to understand the importance of this trend. Why is it important, or desirable, that a person be the very first to read a new novel or see a current movie? What exactly does that really say about the person?

I've been racking my brain and I can't come up with a good answer. I keep thinking that ten years down the line who will still care that this person was the first to have read a certain novel if by that point we've both read it? How does it matter that you went to Denmark before I did, if we've both been there?

I see the advice-oriented benefits to having already done something. If you've already been to Denmark, you might be able to tell me where to eat or which sightseeing tours not to miss, but that's about all. Same goes for a book or a movie; you could tell me what you thought about it. Even then, it might say nothing about what I will think about it.

In many industries, especially technology, being first sometimes actually has a negative correlation with being the best. America had analog cell phones much earlier than many countries, including Turkey. But as a late-adopter Turkey was able to invest into the latest and greatest digital technology, which had been invented by the time cell phones made it to Turkey. Today, digital phones in America are much more expensive and not as reliable as their counterparts in Turkey.

Software programming is also similar. Someone who learned how to code many years ago might have been the greatest Fortran or Cobol programmer ever, but for these people making the leap to Object Oriented Programming has been much more difficult, causing them to lose their jobs to latecomers.

So being the first is not always the best and I really can't see why it's such a 'hot' trait. Why does it matter that she was the first to use the color orange? Why does it matter that he wore a turtleneck way before many others?

It all just seems so trivial to me.

But if you have any useful insight on this matter, I'd love it if you shared it.

Previously? Family Values.


June 16, 2001 ~ 00:06 | link | random thoughts | share[]


AT A LOSS

There are long periods in history where for some reason or another, a person has had to hide their identity. Some awful cases exist even today.

I know there are some well-known examples and others that seem to have faded, though they definitely shouldn't have. One of my core beliefs is that people should be allowed to be whatever and whomever they choose to be.

I don't understand how any one person could claim to know what the 'right' or 'acceptable' way is. And how does it really affect one person's life that the other exists. It's one thing for me to go around and try to convert people to be something else, and another for me to just be that on my own. In my opinion only the weak fear what's different. The uneducated seek comfort in being close-minded.

What I hate with even more vigor are people who discriminate just to be a part of 'the gang.' While one is stupid and ignorant, the other knows full well the atrocity of such behavior and continues to do it nonetheless.

I was thinking today that I don't spend enough time appreciating the liberty I have had. Luckily, I've never been discriminated against, at least to my knowledge. I've been classified as "you people" several times in my life and have always spoken up to let people know that just because I might be in what's labeled as a minority, it's not suddenly okay to segregate.

In the same way, I don't enjoy when the minorities themselves use this separation to their advantage. I don't like it to be "women's month" for anything. That implies that women are still a minority and need to be handled as a separate entity. I remember reading in Heather's interview at the women zinester survey that her vision for "women's web" is a place where such a term is unnecessary and thinking that I loved her answer. I don't want to read into her words or put words in her mouth but for me, the fact that someone needs to single "women" out means there still is a problem.

I'm all for people being proud of who they are. All for people with the same beliefs or issues getting together and using each other for support. But the minute these people use the segregation to their advantage, to me it's like they're supporting the ideals of the people who put them in this position in the first place.

Today, I'm feeling thankful that I live in a city where people don't judge me for my differences. I feel thankful for having had a smooth life and thankful to those who fought for me to be able to have this life. It's crucial that people fight against being forced to hide their identity.

For if we lose that, what have we left?

Previously? At the Ballet.


June 11, 2001 ~ 00:06 | link | random thoughts | share[]


ALL FOR ONE

I was raised in a very Jewish environment. I don't mean to imply that it was religious, just that my surroundings almost exclusively consisted of Jewish people. In a country where 99 percent of the population is Muslim, I imagine it's not rare for the minorities to stick together.

I also hated most anyone I grew up with. Almost all of them were snotty, air headed, superficial people. They judged you solely on looks and what brand names you wore. They backstabbed without discrimination and they were cruel.

So as soon as I was old enough, I chose my own friends, most of whom were Muslim. When hanging out with them I used to joke that since I was a Jew myself, it was acceptable for me to belittle other Jews.

There's a discussion in MetaFilter this week about Mel Brooks's comment upon accepting one of this Tony awards. The poster complains that he finds it unacceptable that people make light of such a dreadful situation as the Holocaust. One of the counterarguments posed is that since Brooks is Jewish himself, he should be allowed to make fun of it any way he pleases.

My personal opinions on the matter aside, I think saying that since Brooks is Jewish he should be able to treat Jewish subject matters however he chooses, is unacceptable. For the people who said that there are many ways to deal with an issue and this may be how Brooks chooses to do it, that's fine. I'm just against the idea that any member of a group of people should be allowed to speak on behalf of the group.

Just because Brooks is Jewish doesn't mean he's the chosen speaker for all Jews worldwide. It also doesn't mean he's not allowed to have his point of view and feelings about the matter. We're all allowed to have thoughts on anything. Even though I'm not Muslim, I might have an opinion on the misconceptions about Muslim people in Western civilizations. While it's true that I might not know what being Muslim feels like firsthand, that doesn't automatically disqualify me from being able to intelligently discuss the subject matter.

In the same token, just because I'm Jewish doesn't mean my opinion qualifies for all Jews. Some Jews might find power in looking at the humor or irony in the horror of it all, while others might abhor the idea of the word comedy and Holocaust being used in the same sentence. People will always have differing opinions and feelings about similar experiences; that's what makes the world interesting. And someone's right will often be someone else's wrong. And that's fine.

Sure Brooks can address the Holocaust in a manner he finds appropriate and so can a Swiss or a Muslim or most any other person. And there is a difference between speaking from first hand experience and just reading or interfacing with others, but it still doesn't mean that all members of a minority see eye to eye on all issues concerning that minority group.

So saying that Brooks could make fun of the Holocaust because he's Jewish seems like an invalid argument to me.

Not that the show is directly about Jews or the Holocaust anyhow.

Previously? Blissful Ignorance.


June 05, 2001 ~ 00:06 | link | random thoughts | share[]


FROM CRAWLING TO RUNNING

If I were a car, I'd be one stuck on overdrive.

During sixth grade, I prepared all year for an exam that would allow me to transfer from one school to a better one. After ten months of obscene hours of studying, private lessons, and a ruined summer, three days before the exam I found out that the school would only accept one person.

Almost a hundred of us taking the test and they would let in only one person.

I had no chance in hell.

But I'd come this far and I was going to take the damn test regardless. On the morning of the exam, I woke up with a fever of 38.5, which is 101.3 for the Celsius challenged. It seemed like all signs pointed to this school not being in my future.

I went to the test nonetheless. And because I was so sick, I read each question several times, ensuring myself I knew exactly what they were asking. I took my sweet ass time and I didn't worry, mostly cause I couldn't; it was already too much effort to keep my eyelids from closing.

And, of course, I got in. (Otherwise my telling this story would be pointless, right?)

I know that the only reason I scored so high on that test was cause I was too tired to rush through it. I didn't make the usual mistakes that come from hurriedly misreading the question.

I've always done a million things at once. The TV would blast while I did homework. I did my undergraduate degree and graduate degree simultaneously. During the same four years, I held five different jobs on campus, dated two different men (not simultaneously of course!) so it wasn't like I was closed up in my room studying all the time. Even when I walk down the street I walk rapidly, more concerned with my destination than my route. Always rushing. If I'm not doing a million things, I'm often doing nothing. It's like a car that can do 0 or 100 but nothing in between.

I know that I have my mom to thank for these specific genes. She suffers from the same speed problem and often complains at the end of each day about how she has a million things to do and how she feels overwhelmingly worn out.

On Saturday, I lifted one of my nephews in an effort to stop him from jumping into the not-so-clean waters of the Bosphorus. Within twenty seconds, my back reminded me what a completely moronic decision that was. Pains started shooting up and down my left leg.

So my back is broke. Again.

Now I'm walking, more like limping I guess, around New York City, slowly.

Slowly.

I am taking my time. I have no choice. But I'm realizing that while fast accomplishes many things, slow is crucial. It makes you pay attention. It makes you see details. It makes you think.

It makes you enjoy.

I'm sad it took my body's incapacity to get me here, but I'm trying to make the most of it. I'm learning that sometimes you want to cruise at 40 and appreciate the landscape.

Previously? Hatred.


May 31, 2001 ~ 00:05 | link | random thoughts | share[]


REGRETS AND RISKS


I've always been hung up on the past.

Logically I fully understand the uselessness of getting hung up on the mistakes or bad decisions that have already been made. The idea is that you learn and you move on. My brain often has problems relaying this crucial and sensible information to my mind and emotions. If I ever hurt someone I tend to feel responsible for the rest of my life.

I've learned that since I can't let go easily, it's best for me to try most anything such that I won't have to live with regrets. This lesson, of course, doesn't come cheap.

Many years ago, as a teenager, I was completely infatuated with a friend who felt the same way about me. For one reason or another, I thought it best not to date him at the time. It completely broke his heart and he no longer wanted to speak with me. Literally to the day I still feel awful about this stupid mistake that I've made over twelve years ago. I still wonder at times how my life would have turned out had I had the guts to date him way back when.

It's not to say that I'm not thrilled with how my life turned out. I adore my boyfriend and I don't regret a moment of being with him or with any of my previous ones. I just regret that at the time I wasn't more honest with myself or him about why we couldn't go out and that I never took the chances as they reappeared later on in our lives.

He's one of the major reasons I take risks today. I know that I don't want to look back and say "what if" with all the other things in my life. I'd rather try and fail than never try at all.

The funny thing is, most likely, had we dated it wouldn't have worked out and we would have broken up not to really ever speak again. Now that we never did, we're pretty good friends. So I spose that would have never happened. But still I cannot help but think all the "what if" scenarios.

Especially when I'm home where so many of my mistakes were made. Over here what I do is under the scrutiny of too many people. The small group of people with whom my family associates watches over all of us like hawkes. I was often too scared to take risks. Too scared that I would be judged and alienated even more than I already was.

Once I made it to the US, I was suddenly free to do as I pleased. And all the risks were mine to take, the mistakes mine to make.

And I'm truly thankful for them.

Previously? OCD.


May 24, 2001 ~ 00:05 | link | random thoughts | share[]


KEVIN BACON

Three years ago, I walked into my then-boss' office and we started chit chatting and she showed me pictures from her wedding. As I stared at picture number three, I was blown away? "What's this girl's name?" I asked, knowing the answer full well. My boss confirmed my suspicions. The girl who stared at me from the picture was none other than the ex of my ex. Funny enough, she was now dating my boss's ex.

To make matters even more creepy, we ran into the two of them at a flight to Missouri. They were seated along the aisle from us.

Heh.

When I was in college, the mother of one of the admission counselors had just come back from Turkey. She showed me a photo she'd taken with a guy who shared the same bus with her when she traveled south. The guy was my best friend from home. My first boyfriend.

Heh.

Today I was chatting with someone whose weblog I stumbled upon by chance and I find out that his best friend went to the same school as Jake and me. To add to the absurdity, he and Jake were in the same dormitory for several years. I may have even seen this guy many times.

Heh.

I think Disney might be right; it's a small world after all.

Previously? Immobile.


April 13, 2001 ~ 00:04 | link | random thoughts | share[]


NOWHERE TO GO BUT DOWN

I remember a Brown alumnus, in Turkey, who asked me the following question in an interview. "Would you rather have fame or fortune?" I seem to recall the original question having three options, but for the life of me, I can't remember the third, which is real weird since that's the option I'd chosen. (The even weirder fact is that I never applied to Brown University so obviously it must have been a different school's alumnus, but my memory insists it was Brown.)

If I were asked the same question today, I think I'd answer differently. At the time both fame and fortune seemed beside the point. I told her that I'd just like to be really good at my job. I would want to be respected in my field. Her question implied an excess and I don't need too much of either.

Not to say there aren't benefits to being famous. People give you things (mostly so you'd promote it for them) for free and they'll do anything to be associated with you. That's one of the reasons most charities try to have a celebrity talk about their cause. But there are too many downsides to being famous. Too many people think they know you. You never have a personal life. Not that I would really know, but that's what my imagination assumes, at least.

I've never been famous. Not even for fifteen minutes. But I have been put on a pedestal by different people in my life. And I don't like it. When someone thinks you're so wonderful and amazing, all you can do is disappoint that person. We're all human. We make mistakes. We hurt people. We have faults. Most of us have disgusting habits. Many of us suffer from self-doubt. We don't always say the right thing. We don't always do the right thing.

So when we're placed on a mantle, we're bound to fall down. As we never belonged there initially.

That's not to say that some people don't have amazing talents. There are many people on and off the web that I admire madly. I respect their talent, especially of the humble ones. When someone's really cocky, it's harder to look up to that person. There are many areas where I wish I were as good as these people. When I read an amazing book, see a great design, an awe-inspiring piece of art, and a really clear and intelligent piece of code. All of these inspire me. I feel thankful that such people live and make our world a better place. I strive to learn from them. But I don't forget that they, too, are human.

The problem with the pedestal is that it distorts reality. So when the person makes a mistake, as humans are bound to, his or her admirer starts hating him. How dare the great designer make an ordinary-looking page? How dare he not respond to my email? Who does he think he is? All this anger coming from the fact that you set the person up to a set of standards that he was bound to not meet.

I often see the same thing in relationships. One partner totally blinded by the other one. He can do no wrong. Until he does, of course, mess up and the entire relationship is destroyed. If you start up so high, there's nowhere to go but down.

So I'd still prefer not to have fame. Fortune, however, is welcome at my house anytime.

Previously? Opera.


April 07, 2001 ~ 00:04 | link | random thoughts | share[]


CELEBRATION

Isabella Rosselini has a new perfume. As I watched the program where she was talking about the process of making this perfume a reality, she said that her logo for the perfume was that it should be a scent representing not this mystical thing that we strive to be but who we really are.

Which, of course, made me think.

There is an entire set of products whose job is to make us look and feel better. Perfume and makeup are easy to recognize members of such a club. Most of their function is in distorting reality. In hiding the blemishes and highlighting the strengths.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

For all intensive purposes, striving to be better is wonderful. It gives you drive, motivation and direction. Nothing wrong with a healthy dose of self-competition.

Healthy being the operative word.

I think these industries have gone so overboard that we feel ugly without make-up. We feel obligated to buy seventeen skin products to look decent. There's nothing wrong with trying to accentuate the positive and go the extra mile on special occasions. As long as they don't distort our idea of who we are.

I know many people who won't even buy milk without putting makeup on, or wearing heels. Argh. Looking spiffy is nice, but who you are is so much more than that and why do you really have to be this "mystical entity" all the time?

I like the idea of celebrating who we are. Putting light makeup, dressing comfortably, being happier in your own skin. I wish more of us did that. We're so busy being fed the person we have the potential to be, that we never enjoy being the person we already are.

It's like people who live for the freedom they'll have once they're retired but their entire life is torture until that moment. We live in a society where plastic surgery and diet programs thrive. One where size 2 is the norm and one where normal-looking people are never good enough. Images get doctored, blemishes covered. Views are skewed.

What's so bad about just being you?

Previously? Trust.


March 30, 2001 ~ 00:03 | link | random thoughts | share[]


SLIPPERY WHEN WET

It's pouring outside. When we were little, my sister would say that rain is God crying. During earthquakes, she'd say it's the devils fighting down below. Quite funny, cause we were never ever a religious family.

I don't like rain. Over the years, I've observed that people either love it or hate it. Rain always depresses me. It makes me think of mud. In the non-paved streets of Istanbul, rain doesn't cause a pretty mixture. Maybe it's due to my having lived in big cities all my life, but rain is people rushing home, subways overflowing, and the unbearable traffic

I could imagine a beautiful house with large glass panes, facing the ocean, by the beach. In that case and assuming I don't work or that I work from home, rain might not conjure up such bad emotions. If I lived by some trees, I might like that, too. I love the smell of wet trees.

I suppose the other factor would be the temperature. If it were raining but warm, like in Florida, I could go out in the rain in my shorts and twirl around. I might even do cartwheels. In Turkey, during the summer, we get short, fast showers. I remember many times where I'd be walking at Burgaz from my house to the club as I got caught in one of them and I'd get soaked. And then, just as quickly as it started, it would all be over and the sun would cover the sky, the last few drops decorating it with rainbows. It never bummed me out then, I just jumped in the sea with my clothes on.

I guess it's closely related to my frame of mind. In the ideal setting, with no work to do, rain is delightful, but in New York, during lunch or the commute home, it's a pain.

I'm definitely ready for spring.

Previously? Silence.


March 21, 2001 ~ 02:03 | link | random thoughts | share[]


TOO MUCH INFORMATION

A while back, Jason polled his readers about their preferred superpower. Even though it didn't win, my choice of the three would have been to make myself invisible. But my real option wasn't even on the list. If I got to pick my superpower, I'd want to read people's thoughts.

I'm confident this is an outcome of my childhood dealings with two-faced people. But even besides that I'm always fascinated by what goes through people's minds. How people feel about things and what they're thinking at specific moments.

So alongside the "I wish I knew what people think about me" thought, I do have a scientific interest in this superpower.

Ahem. Well most wise people in my life say that this would be a huge disaster. When you hear other people's thoughts, you'll quickly realize that the world is not a nice place. Even people whom you consider close friends, have negative thoughts about you every now and then. And some things are better left unsaid. There is a reason we choose to say some words out loud and others not to say at all.

Think of the number of times you think a negative thought about your best friend. About your boyfriend. Even about your family. How much of a relationship would you have with any of them if they could read your mind?

I totally agree that the above is food for thought. But it also makes me wonder why we keep certain things unsaid. When you feel anger or sorrow and you keep it inside, it only builds up to become resentment. If someone pisses you off, why don't you tell them? If someone hurts your feelings, is it better to not be honest? When does hiding become a good thing?

Maybe I am naive, maybe I am stupid. But I'd still like to hear people's thoughts.

At least until I lose all faith in humanity.

What about you? Would you want to hear other people's thoughts?

Previously? Labyrinths.


March 12, 2001 ~ 00:03 | link | random thoughts | share[]


VARIETY GAME

I've never understood people who hate different people. Whether it be a differing skin color, religious background, sexual preference or dressing up in an odd fashion.

Why is it that some people get angry when they see gay men? How is that so threatening? Why does it bother you if a guy decides to dress up like a girl? My very first gay friend ever was a guy named Brad. Freshman year in college. Kinda late, I know, but people don't come out all that easily in Turkey. Or they didn't in my environment when I lived there.

Maybe I remember it differently, but I don’t recall being mad at Brad, ever. He was a kind, giving and caring person. He had just told his parents and they had not reacted well. Actually quite badly. Enough such that he ended up having to drop out of college to save money so he could afford to go back in college.

I just don't understand the hostility. Does it come from a fear that if such people exist you might accidentally become one? How little fun would life be if we all looked the same and we all thought the same. Yet, even as a child we tend to feel the need to make fun of others. Little kids love to gang up against an unusual looking little boy or a girl with a funny name.

One of the reasons I love New York is that one rarely feels like a freak here. There are so many varieties of people and everyone's so busy living their own lives that, they don't have the time to stare at others. Or they don't care.

I love that.

Just live and let live, I think. As long as you're not affecting my life, who am I to tell you how to live yours?

Previously? Blondes Have More Fun.


February 18, 2001 ~ 00:02 | link | random thoughts | share[]


CHANGES ABOUND

If you've been here before, you'll probably notice that I've made some changes. I think it's all pretty self-explanatory so go explore. And, of course, all comments are welcome.

Many thanks go to Heather for taking the time to help me figure out how to download the images from my watch to my PC. Since I'd already had several conversations with Casio support and with the company where I bought my watch, my next step was going to be sending the units back. So Heather did me a huge, huge favor.

Jake's out of town in Lakeland, Florida, celebrating his grandmother's ninetieth birthday. Normally, I'd be there, too, but I'm not allowed to fly. So he's there loving the beautiful weather and I'm stuck in bed, watching TiVo.

I don't do well when Jake's gone. It's not that I can't be alone, it's just that I really like having him around. Even when he sits in the living room and I spend the day in bed, knowing he's next door makes me happy. I guess I'm like a little girl who always wants her friend around. Jake's my best friend and I like him near me. I also like waking up next to him. Oh well, one more day and he'll be back.

My back is doing better. Wohoo! Not healed, yet, but any improvement is enough to make me ecstatic.

Today was my third pottery class and I think I'm finally getting the hang of it. My fingerprints don't leave imprints on the clay any longer and I've even managed to make a bowl, a single-rose vase and a cup. They're all lopsided but I'm just glad I'm learning to enjoy it and to relax. The most fun part is seeing the clay mold under your fingers as the wheel turns. A tiny bit of pressure exerted in one area affects the entire shape of the pot. When I watch the teacher and see the clay shift shapes, it almost seems magical.

Previously? The Right Way


January 27, 2001 ~ 00:01 | link | random thoughts | share[]


TIDBITS OF LIFE
After a three-week hiatus, I went back to my volunteer job today. Today's task was to call the supervisors of each employed client to find out whether the employer is still happy with the person. Hearing comments like 'He's awesome' and 'We're very happy' made my day even though I don't know any of these people personally. When I think of my job, that's what counts most. I want to be doing a good job. Cheesy? Maybe, but it's the truth.

When I was in Japan, there was an arcade right by my house. I'm not originally a huge fan of arcades but this one had a typing game that my friend John and I played until the wee hours of the morning. It's the same game as The House of the Dead but instead of shooting, you have to type the words that appear on the screen to kill the monsters. The Japanese version had Japanese words, therefore making the typing really hard. I almost bought a Dreamcast just to be able to play this game but there was no American version. Until Now. Yeaaaaayyyy!!!

Ten Passed Technologies [ via slashdot ] Real interesting but they certainly should have included Betamax as well.

Okay, I admit. I watch the Rosie O'Donnell Show. Embarrassing? Probably, but I like it. It keeps me abreast of many upcoming movies. I like that she's so nice to all her guests as opposed to other talk show hosts who try to squeeze out the juicy bits of the guests’ lives. Today she had on the man who won the Teacher of the Year award from Disney and this teacher was so excited and he talked about how he had a second job as a waited cause his salary was so low and his bills were so high. Thanks to Rosie's show Barnes and Noble donated 10grand worth of books to this teacher's class and Rosie made his lifelong dream of seeing the Great Wall of China come true by buying him and a friend tickets to China. This guy was so amazingly thrilled that I teared up. I know slate hates her and I know that I should be embarrassed to be watching it, but I love seeing all the happiness that she works so hard to give. In a world where there are so few well-intentioned people left, she makes me smile.

Previously?


December 19, 2000 ~ 00:12 | link | random thoughts | share[]


STILL SICK
Goody Links
Two weird links today, both from the pages of MetaFilter.

The first is disgusting and as someone who actually does eat at McDonalds, this link brought me a step closer to becoming vegetarian today.

The second is quite creepy. I'm not exactly sure how I feel about this, yet so I will refrain from commenting further.

Btw, a few days too late for me but if you ever get the Feliz Navided virus, this page will help you fix it. Or so I'm told. No personal guarantees since I didn't fix mine that way.

Thoughts
Still in severe amounts of pain. I am so thankful to those of you who've been kind enough to send me cards and wish me well. I'm sure it will be over soon enough, I'm just dreading having to sit for three hours to take that exam on Sunday. To add to that, I haven't cracked the book open all week. Thank you so much for your thoughtful messages.

I'm awful about email. The way email works for me is that I either reply immediately or it sits in my inbox for weeks which turn into months. I folder all my mail once it's answered and so I know that anything in my Inbox is something that needs a response. I have messages there from August. That's how bad I am. Whenever I write a mail to someone, I can never wait for the answer without worrying. I want to get their answer immediately. If a full day passes, I'm already heartbroken and disappointed that the person didn't care enough to reply. And here I am doing the very same thing. It's awful and it's incredibly rude. If you sent me mail and I didn't respond and you're reading this, I apologize wholeheartedly. I've been using the Japanese exam excuse for the last few weeks but I can always come up with one cuz my life is full enough to pull one out of a list. To be honest, my life wouldn't mean anything to me without the people who do send me mail and call me and are happy to spend time with me. If I blow those people off, I deserve to be alone. People deserve better. You deserve better. I apologize. I will reply. I mean it.

I have so many thoughts dancing in my head lately. Thoughts about my life. Thoughts about who I am. Who I want to be. Who I should be. Who I will never be. I try hard to get to know myself and understand why I feel the need to do some of the things I do. More on this later, most likely.

Today, three of my workmates and I had lunch together. One girl was from Russia and the other girl and guy were from India. We started talking bout the games we played as kids, during recess, etc. It was amazing how many games we had in common. Russia, India and Turkey and the games were exactly the same. I find it fascinating that even then, before the web (and since we only had one TV channel when I was a kid and it was government regulated, you can't even say we saw them on TV) our cultures had all that in common. I think that's fascinating and wonderful.

Tomorrow is World AIDS day. Please take the time to share your stories, educate yourself, and share your knowledge.

Before?


November 30, 2000 ~ 00:11 | link | random thoughts | share[]


HOW TO HAIL A CAB IN NEW YORK
The election is still not over, and it's getting messier by the minute. I don't even know when it's gonna end but I can already tell it's gonna be a total mess. The ending will be interesting, possibly devastating and definitely disputed.

One of the reasons I love living in New York City is cause you can hail cabs here. I'm used to being able to go out in the street, stick out my arm and have a yellow one stop right in front of me. When I moved from Istanbul to Pittsburgh, that was one of the things I missed most. In Pittsburgh, you call a cab and start praying for it to show. Anyhow, back to New York. The thing that baffles me is how few people know the simple taxi system. All cabs in New York use the same strategy to symbolize whether they are free or not. If the sign on top of the cab is not lit, it's Occupied. If it's totally lit, it's Off Duty and if the mid section is lit, it's Available. When hailing for a cab, all you need to do is look for the cabs whose middle light is on. How complicated is that? (And if my explanation sounds complicated, it's only cause I suck at explaining not cause it's actually confusing.) It took me all of a day or two to figure this out. For some reason, New York is full of people who have not. It really baffles me.

Thank God it's Friday. This week has been long and draining so I am really glad it's over. I'm tired of coming home with a whole set of ideas on what I need to do and how I'm going to get it all done and ending up on the couch, unable to move. I'm planning to use this weekend to recharge. And accomplish the millions of things on my list.

Before?


November 10, 2000 ~ 00:11 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MIX OF THOUGHTS
Many thoughts today.

I don't really hang out with Turkish people in the States. I have a few friends from home who live in New York but we see each other once every few months. My boyfriend is American and so are most of my close friends. Or they are Russian, Irish, Brazilian... anything but Turkish. This is not on purpose, but it is a fact. I also read almost exclusively in English. In the last ten years, I've read one Turkish book. The funny thing is right after I come back from a visit home, I'm totally immersed into Turkish culture. I'm reading a Turkish book and have been constantly listening to an amazing song by Teoman called Paramparca which translates to 'in pieces'. Here's the mp3 if you wanna listen. Even my mother adores this song.

Yesterday I happened to watch CBS's early show and they had the author of My War : A Love Story in Letters and Drawings from World War II. Mr. Sugarman had just gotten married when he was drafted and his wife gave him a set of watercolors and told him to paint for her. This book is a collection of those paintings and the love letters he wrote to her. I saw some of the pictures and heard an excerpt from the letters and they sound amazing. Even though I'm not usually a fan of war books, I am definitely getting this one.

The same show had a segment on bullying which is a real problem that doesn't get enough attention. The show talked about a new hotline for the issue. I'm glad someone's doing something about it.

I feel grateful that I'm not in the selling business. Either a product or a service. I believe selling well requires two strengths that I don't possess. One, self-confidence and two, ability to suck up well. I'm more on the paranoid side and tend to not think so highly of myself and I can't suck up to save my life. I would be a surefire failure in the selling business.

October is breast cancer awareness month. Be aware and make others aware.

It's really amazing how worked up I can get about the debates especially considering that I am not American and I cannot vote. I'm really enraged by some people's lack of attention and their apathy. You need to care. If you lose hope, what do you have left? Also, I really can't understand how people can vote for someone who is so obviously a total moron, but we won't get into that.

Told you I had a lot to say today...

Oh and I must mention the subway series. I hope the Mets win only cause the Yankees already have won so many in a row. It'd be neat to see the Mets in the spotlight for a change.

Before?


October 18, 2000 ~ 00:10 | link | random thoughts | share[]


DEATH
More Than Words
Yesterday's lyric, "Trying to make some sense of it all, but I can see that it makes no sense at all" is from Stuck in the middle with you by Stealers Wheel.

Here's today's: "And if you said this life ain't good enough, I would give my world to lift you up."

Know the source? Mail me.

Have suggestions?

Goody Links
I usually don't link to anything that's already mentioned in MetaFilter but I've talked about these cows before, so I figure it's fair that I let you know that amazon's auctioning them tomorrow.

Openletters has a new letter everyday. I've enjoyed quite a few of them. The conversation with the most popular girl in school was one of my favorites.

Thoughts
It's amazing how short life is. It's also sad that we only think about how short life is when someone dies suddenly. While I don't necessarily subscribe to the "be thankful you have arms and legs" mantra that most parents preach to their children, I do think that it's not a good idea to spend too much time being upset over things. (Don't get me wrong, I am thankful that I have arms and legs. I am thankful for much more than that. But every time something makes me sad, I can't just smile cause I have all my limbs. Sometimes, I want to be sad and look up at the people who have more than I do, not less.) Life really is too short. If you're in a job you don't like, get out of it. Or at least start thinking seriously about how you can get out of it. If you have friends who make you sad or angry more often than happy, they're not your friends. If something isn't working out for you, then change it. Believe me, you can. I just think that most people are too lazy to make their life into what they wish it could be. Days pass so quickly and as Derek put so wonderfully: "I think that you only get one go at this life, and it's up to you to make sure you leave a story worth telling."

Sorry about the little preaching session. Someone I met a month ago, died today and I just realized, once more, that life is too short. I wish it didn't take such tragedy to knock some sense into me.

I would lie if I said I read his page but I do think this is truly well-said. I would give credit to the source of my link but I read it in several places and I can't remember which one was first.


September 28, 2000 ~ 00:09 | link | random thoughts | share[]


OPTIONS
Life is about options. Each time you choose to do something, you’re choosing to do that thing over something else. While we think long and hard about some choices we make, we arbitrarily make many others. For example, most of us, I hope, wake up and brush our teeth. We don’t stop and think about whether we should or not. It’s something we’ve done since childhood and it’s automatic. This is an obvious example but I bet there are many other things in your life that you do without thinking cause at one point you made the decision to do things that way. Take today to think of some things you do without realizing that you’ve made that choice over something else. Do you always go out drinking on Thursday nights? Do you spend Sunday nights talking to your mother? Whatever it is, try and observe the choices you make a little more carefully since your priorities might have changed since the last time you made that decision.

Wow, I didn’t mean to drivel like that. I have no idea where it came from. Anyhow, after that heavy piece, here’s some fun. Okay, not very funny, but I’m trying.

Btw, we bought it and I highly recommend it.


September 14, 2000 ~ 00:09 | link | random thoughts | share[]


DRUNK
Last night, around 11, Jake and I took a walk around the neighborhood. As we walked back into the building, some girl lay sprawled all over the lobby. A bunch of people knelt next to her, so I walked over to the doorman and asked after her well being. The doorman replied, "She's a little drunk."

For a second, I got a glimpse of my college days. I must say I don't miss that part of school.

Only two days till my birthday, what did you get me?


September 10, 2000 ~ 00:09 | link | random thoughts | share[]


BOOK READING
It's a bummer I can't vote.

Well, I'm off to the book reading. Hopefully, that'll cheer me up.


September 07, 2000 ~ 00:09 | link | random thoughts | share[]


THURSDAY
Thursday might be my favorite week-day. It's a day when you know the week is almost over, but not yet and you enjoy the anticipation. I seem to get more work done on Thursday than any other day. Wednesday is kinda neat as it's the middle of the week but there are still two more days to go. Friday, you know it's over and you're not really motivated, you just wait for the day to end, so you can go home. Anyhow, I'm enojoying my Thursday this week.

A McSweeney's article for people who love angels. It's quite funny.

Mel C of the Spice Girls says she wants men, not women. I know you wanted to know.



August 31, 2000 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


MORE ABOUT LIGHTS
Oh and I forgot to mention that they turn off all the lights for "Day Without Art/Night Without Lights" : AIDS Aweness on December 1.


August 28, 2000 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


EMPIRE STATE LIGHTS
If you live in New York City, you might have wondered what the Empire State light's represent. The red, white and blue on American holidays is always easy to tell. So is the pale pink and green during Easter. There was a small article in last week's New York Times, which told the keys to some of the more unusual ones. For example, the tower goes pink and white in September for "Race for the Cure" for Breast Cancer. In October, they light up in purple, teal and white for the National Osteoporosis Society. October 3rd, the German Reunification day, turns the building's top to black, yellow and red. They also celebrate India Independence Day with green, white and orange and Portugal Day on June 10th with red, yellow and green. They have Pulaski Day with red and white in October and blue, white and blue for Hanukkah.

The article also mentions that the building has a policy of not honoring commercial products, corporate events or private occasions. An exception was when in March 1995, the building went blue to celebrate the announcement of the blue M&Ms.


August 28, 2000 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]


NYSD


If you ever wondered what PEZ means or why Rolling Rock bottles have the number 33 on them, you must check out The Straight Dope. I've sat in the bookstore and spent hours reading random questions from his books and now, most of them are on the Web.

At noon, I go back to New York Society for the Deaf. It's really interesting being there and working with deaf people. I'm always amazed at how flexible their fingers are and how quickly they sign. It also fascinates me how they make up signs for certain words. For example, last week, I helped a few women fill out a form for housing aide. One of the items on the form asked if they currently live in substandard housing. Another item asked if their rent is subsidized. I kept wondering if there is a sign for subsidized. The only way I managed to explain it to her was to ask if anyone helped pay her rent, but I bet there is a sign that would have conveyed it better. Sign Language is really amazing. It's the only language where you can say two totally different words at the same exact moment.




August 21, 2000 ~ 00:08 | link | random thoughts | share[]
©2008 karenika.com